Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
复制标题
谁说谎了？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
B. Hilbig
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Heck;Isabel Thielmann;Morten Moshagen;B. Hilbig
先前的研究已经确定，在作弊范例中，更高水平的诚实-谦逊（HH）特质与更少的不诚实行为相关。然而，只有不精确的影响大小估计，这种HH作弊链接。此外，关于HEXACO或大五模型中的其他基本人格特征是否与不道德的决策有关，以及这些影响是否具有超越HH的增量有效性，证据尚不确定。我们在对16项研究的高效能重新分析中解决了这些问题，这些研究评估了激励，一次性作弊范例（N = 5，002）中的不诚实行为。为此，我们依靠新开发的逻辑回归方法来分析作弊范式中的嵌套数据。我们还测试了理论推导出的HH与其他基本人格特征（即，行为和责任心）和情境因素（即，观察到有利结果的基线概率）以及HH相对于人口统计学特征的增量有效性。结果显示HH的中等至大的影响（优势比= 0.53），这是独立于其他个性，情境，或人口统计学变量。只有另一个特质（大五人格）与不道德的决策有关，尽管它没有显示出任何超越HH的增量有效性。
Previous research has established that higher levels of trait Honesty-Humility (HH) are associated with less dishonest behavior in cheating paradigms. However, only imprecise effect size estimates of this HH-cheating link are available. Moreover, evidence is inconclusive on whether other basic personality traits from the HEXACO or Big Five models are associated with unethical decision making and whether such effects have incremental validity beyond HH. We address these issues in a highly powered reanalysis of 16 studies assessing dishonest behavior in an incentivized, one-shot cheating paradigm (N = 5,002). For this purpose, we rely on a newly developed logistic regression approach for the analysis of nested data in cheating paradigms. We also test theoretically derived interactions of HH with other basic personality traits (i.e., Emotionality and Conscientiousness) and situational factors (i.e., the baseline probability of observing a favorable outcome) as well as the incremental validity of HH over demographic characteristics. The results show a medium to large effect of HH (odds ratio = 0.53), which was independent of other personality, situational, or demographic variables. Only one other trait (Big Five Agreeableness) was associated with unethical decision making, although it failed to show any incremental validity beyond HH.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
Ashton, MC;Lee, K
通讯作者：
Lee, K
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Hilbig, Benjamin E.;Thielmann, Isabel
通讯作者：
Thielmann, Isabel
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Mueller, Sascha;Moshagen, Morten
通讯作者：
Moshagen, Morten
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
Carpenter, Bob;Gelman, Andrew;Riddell, Allen
通讯作者：
Riddell, Allen
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Moshagen, Morten;Hilbig, Benjamin E.;Zettler, Ingo
通讯作者：
Zettler, Ingo