A systematic comparison between collagen-induced arthritis and pristane-induced arthritis in Dark Agouti rats.
A systematic comparison between collagen-induced arthritis and pristane-induced arthritis in Dark Agouti rats.
复制标题
在暗刺豚鼠中胶原诱导的关节炎和降植烷诱导的关节炎之间的系统比较。
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010-07
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
OBJECTIVES
Both collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and pristane-induced arthritis (PIA) are commonly used rat models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was systematically to compare the differences between CIA and PIA in Dark Agouti (DA) rats.
METHODS
The CIA was induced by immunising DA rats intradermally with collagen type (C) and PIA was induced by injecting subcutaneously with pristane. The arthritis was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically. Nitric oxide (NO) level of plasma was determined by Griess reaction method. Plasma autoimmune antibodies, including C specific IgG antibody (anti-C IgG), cyclic citrullinated peptide specific IgG antibody (anti-CCP IgG), IgM and IgG rheumatoid factors (IgM RF and IgG RF), were detected by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS
The onset of PIA rats was earlier than that of CIA rats. The involved sites of PIA rats were mostly wrist/ankle and metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal (MCP/MTP) joints while those of CIA rats were primarily distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints. NO level of plasma was increased in PIA rats, as anti-C IgG, anti-CCP IgG, IgM RF and IgG RF levels of plasma were increased in CIA rats. The kidney hyaline casts were more frequent in CIA rats than in control rats, with 9/12 in PIA group, 8/8 in CIA, and 4/8 in control, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
PIA mainly affected wrist/ankle joints and MCP/MTP joints, had more severe inflammation and hardly involved other organs; while CIA mostly influenced DIP joints, had more autoimmune antibodies in plasma, and always showed hyaline casts in kidney. These findings will be useful to select the animal model of RA.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4
作者:
Peng Zhang;Dong Han;Ting‐ting Tang;Xiaoling Zhang;K. Dai
通讯作者:
Peng Zhang;Dong Han;Ting‐ting Tang;Xiaoling Zhang;K. Dai
影响因子:
6
作者:
Nacionales, DC;Kelly, KM;Reeves, WH
通讯作者:
Reeves, WH
影响因子:
15.3
作者:
STUART, JM;CREMER, MA;KANG, AH
通讯作者:
KANG, AH
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
C. Jeon;J. Ahn;Chai Jy;Kim Hj;Bae Ek;S. Park;Chow Ey;H. Cha;Ahn Ks;Koh Em
通讯作者:
C. Jeon;J. Ahn;Chai Jy;Kim Hj;Bae Ek;S. Park;Chow Ey;H. Cha;Ahn Ks;Koh Em
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Harris, HE;Liljestrom, M;Klareskog, L
通讯作者:
Klareskog, L