Wildlife response to management regime and habitat loss in the Terai Arc Landscape of Nepal
Wildlife response to management regime and habitat loss in the Terai Arc Landscape of Nepal
复制标题
尼泊尔特莱弧景观野生动物对管理制度和栖息地丧失的反应
DOI：
10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110334
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Ferreira G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ferreira G
许多国家广泛采用建立保护区和缓冲区来减轻生物多样性丧失。然而，与越来越多的证据表明保护区的有益影响相反，缓冲区的生态结果却很少被衡量。在这里，我们使用大型相机陷阱调查和多物种占用模型的数据来评估不同管理制度（巴迪亚国家公园、其缓冲区和缓冲区外的区域）在保护尼泊尔特莱弧景观中野生动物方面的有效性。使用缓冲区以外的区域作为反事实，比较 25 种 > 1 公斤的哺乳动物物种的出现概率，我们发现国家公园和缓冲区分别对 7 个和 6 个物种产生了积极影响。 3个物种在缓冲区外的出现概率高于在国家公园内的发生概率，但没有一个物种在缓冲区外的出现概率大于缓冲区内的发生概率。物种丰富度分析表明，管理制度对物种群体的影响存在差异。对于非受威胁和草食物种，缓冲区的表现优于缓冲区外的区域，与国家公园相似或更好。然而，对于受威胁物种和大型食肉动物（食肉动物和食虫动物），国家公园的表现优于其他管理制度。我们的结果还表明，缓冲区部分减轻了国家公园外栖息地丧失的影响，这表明管理制度可能在调节尼泊尔人类主导景观中农业对野生动物的影响方面发挥作用。
The establishment of protected areas and buffer zones has been widely adopted in many countries to mitigate biodiversity loss. However, in contrast to the growing evidence about the beneficial impacts of protected areas, ecological outcomes of buffer zones have rarely been measured. Here, we use data from a large camera trap survey and multi-species occupancy modelling to assess the effectiveness of different management regimes (Bardia National Park, its buffer zone, and areas outside the buffer zone) at safeguarding wildlife in the Terai Arc Landscape of Nepal. Using areas outside the buffer zone as the counterfactual to compare occurrence probability of 25 mammal species >1 kg, we revealed a positive effect of the national park and the buffer zone on seven and six species, respectively. Three species had greater occurrence probability outside the buffer zone than in the national park, but no species had greater occurrence probability outside the buffer zone than inside the buffer zone. Analysis of species richness indicated that management regime differentially affects species groups. For non-threatened and herbivorous species, the buffer zone performed better than areas outside the buffer zone and similar to, or better than, the national park. However, for threatened species and large animalivores (carnivores and insectivores) the national park outperformed the other management regimes. Our results also suggest that the buffer zone partially mitigated the impacts of habitat loss outside the national park, indicating that management regime may play a role in modulating the effect of agriculture on wildlife in human-dominated landscapes in Nepal.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Drouilly, Marine;Clark, Allan;O'Riain, M. Justin
通讯作者：
O'Riain, M. Justin
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Ferreira, Guilherme Braga;Collen, Ben;Carbone, Chris
通讯作者：
Carbone, Chris
影响因子：
11.6
作者：
J. P. Suraci;Kaitlyn M. Gaynor;Maximilian L Allen;P. Alexander;J. Brashares;Sara J. Cendejas-Zarelli;K. Crooks;L. Elbroch;Tavis Forrester;Austin M. Green;J. Haight;Nyeema C. Harris;M. Hebblewhite;F. Isbell;Barbara E. Johnston;R. Kays;P. Lendrum;Jesse S. Lewis;A. McInturff;W. McShea;Thomas W. Murphy;M. Palmer;A. Parsons;Mitchell A. Parsons;Megan E. Pendergast;C. Pekins;L. Prugh;K. Sager-Fradkin;Stephanie G Schuttler;Ç. Şekercioğlu;Brenda Shepherd;Laura S. Whipple;J. Whittington;G. Wittemyer;C. Wilmers
通讯作者：
J. P. Suraci;Kaitlyn M. Gaynor;Maximilian L Allen;P. Alexander;J. Brashares;Sara J. Cendejas-Zarelli;K. Crooks;L. Elbroch;Tavis Forrester;Austin M. Green;J. Haight;Nyeema C. Harris;M. Hebblewhite;F. Isbell;Barbara E. Johnston;R. Kays;P. Lendrum;Jesse S. Lewis;A. McInturff;W. McShea;Thomas W. Murphy;M. Palmer;A. Parsons;Mitchell A. Parsons;Megan E. Pendergast;C. Pekins;L. Prugh;K. Sager-Fradkin;Stephanie G Schuttler;Ç. Şekercioğlu;Brenda Shepherd;Laura S. Whipple;J. Whittington;G. Wittemyer;C. Wilmers
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Budhathoki, P
通讯作者：
Budhathoki, P
公园边界之外的保护：缓冲区对秘鲁亚马逊森林砍伐和采矿特许权的影响
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
M. Weisse;L. Naughton
通讯作者：
L. Naughton