Nonverbal Social Withdrawal in Depression: Evidence from manual and automatic analysis.

Nonverbal Social Withdrawal in Depression: Evidence from manual and automatic analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.imavis.2013.12.007
复制
发表时间:
2014-10
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Rosenwald, Dean P.
Rosenwald, Dean P.
中科院分区:
计算机科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Girard, Jeffrey M.;Cohn, Jeffrey F.;Mahoor, Mohammad H.;Mavadati, S. Mohammad;Hammal, Zakia;Rosenwald, Dean P.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

非语言行为和抑郁症的严重程度之间的关系进行了调查,以下抑郁症的参与者在治疗过程中,并录制了一系列的临床访谈。面部表情和头部姿势进行了分析,从视频使用手动和自动系统。这两个系统的FACS动作单位(AU)是高度一致的,并显示出类似的影响,随着时间的推移,抑郁症的严重程度的变化。当症状严重程度高时,参与者做出较少的亲和面部表情(AU 12和15)和更多的非亲和面部表情(Au 14)。参与者还表现出头部运动减少(即,振幅和速度)时,症状严重程度高。这些结果与社会退缩假说一致:抑郁个体使用非语言行为来保持或增加人际距离。随着个人的恢复,他们发出更多的信号,表明愿意加入。自动面部表情分析与手动编码一致,并揭示了相同的发现模式,这表明自动面部表情分析可能会减轻行为和临床科学中手动编码的负担。
The relationship between nonverbal behavior and severity of depression was investigated by following depressed participants over the course of treatment and video recording a series of clinical interviews. Facial expressions and head pose were analyzed from video using manual and automatic systems. Both systems were highly consistent for FACS action units (AUs) and showed similar effects for change over time in depression severity. When symptom severity was high, participants made fewer affiliative facial expressions (AUs 12 and 15) and more non-affiliative facial expressions (AU 14). Participants also exhibited diminished head motion (i.e., amplitude and velocity) when symptom severity was high. These results are consistent with the Social Withdrawal hypothesis: that depressed individuals use nonverbal behavior to maintain or increase interpersonal distance. As individuals recover, they send more signals indicating a willingness to affiliate. The finding that automatic facial expression analysis was both consistent with manual coding and revealed the same pattern of findings suggests that automatic facial expression analysis may be ready to relieve the burden of manual coding in behavioral and clinical science.
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129
发表时间: 1981-01-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
BOWER, GH
通讯作者: BOWER, GH
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.101.1.37
发表时间: 1992-02-01
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
BERENBAUM, H;OLTMANNS, TF
通讯作者: OLTMANNS, TF
DOI: 10.1207/s15324826an0501_2
发表时间: 1998-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
Brozgold, A Z;Borod, J C;Welkowitz, J
通讯作者: Welkowitz, J
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1014624
发表时间: 1989-02-01
期刊: PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
DIXON, AK;FISCH, HU;WALSER, A
通讯作者: WALSER, A
DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1976.11023874
发表时间: 1976-01-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
COYNE, JC
通讯作者: COYNE, JC