Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication: Preferences of Individuals With Locked-in Syndrome.

Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication: Preferences of Individuals With Locked-in Syndrome.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1545968321989331
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Nijboer F
Nijboer F
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Branco MP;Pels EGM;Sars RH;Aarnoutse EJ;Ramsey NF;Vansteensel MJ;Nijboer F

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

脑机接口(BCI)是一种辅助技术(AT),允许闭锁综合征(LIS)患者使用神经信号进行交流。为了设计一个完全被用户接受的通信BCI(cBCI),在研究和开发过程中应该考虑他们的意见。我们评估了潜在cBCI用户的偏好,包括(1)他们希望使用cBCI控制的应用程序,(2)他们更喜欢使用的心理策略来控制cBCI,以及(3)在他们的临床轨迹期间,他们希望了解AT和cBCI。此外,我们调查了被诊断为进行性和突发性(SO)疾病的个体是否有不同的意见。我们采访了28个荷兰人与LIS在3个小时的家访使用多项选择,排名和开放性问题。在采访过程中,参与者被告知有关BCI和可能的心理策略。参与者将直接交流、计算机使用和环境控制列为最受欢迎的cBCI应用。此外,主动cBCI控制策略优于反应性策略。此外,进行性和SO障碍的个人更喜欢被告知AT和cBCI的时刻,他们会需要it.We表明,个人诊断为进行性和SO障碍的首选,在一般情况下,相同的应用程序,心理策略,和时间的信息。通过收集大量LIS患者的意见,本研究为cBCI和其他AT开发的利益相关者提供了有价值的信息。
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been proposed as an assistive technology (AT) allowing people with locked-in syndrome (LIS) to use neural signals to communicate. To design a communication BCI (cBCI) that is fully accepted by the users, their opinion should be taken into consideration during the research and development process. We assessed the preferences of prospective cBCI users regarding (1) the applications they would like to control with a cBCI, (2) the mental strategies they would prefer to use to control the cBCI, and (3) when during their clinical trajectory they would like to be informed about AT and cBCIs. Furthermore, we investigated if individuals diagnosed with progressive and sudden onset (SO) disorders differ in their opinion. We interviewed 28 Dutch individuals with LIS during a 3-hour home visit using multiple-choice, ranking, and open questions. During the interview, participants were informed about BCIs and the possible mental strategies. Participants rated (in)direct forms of communication, computer use, and environmental control as the most desired cBCI applications. In addition, active cBCI control strategies were preferred over reactive strategies. Furthermore, individuals with progressive and SO disorders preferred to be informed about AT and cBCIs at the moment they would need it. We show that individuals diagnosed with progressive and SO disorders preferred, in general, the same applications, mental strategies, and time of information. By collecting the opinion of a large sample of individuals with LIS, this study provides valuable information to stakeholders in cBCI and other AT development.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04122.x
发表时间: 2009-01-01
期刊: DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS
影响因子: --
作者:
Kuebler, Andrea;Furdea, Adrian;Kotchoubey, Boris
通讯作者: Kotchoubey, Boris
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5
发表时间: 1999-10-31
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Cedarbaum, JM;Stambler, N;Nakanishi, A
通讯作者: Nakanishi, A
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112392
发表时间: 2014
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Kübler A;Holz EM;Riccio A;Zickler C;Kaufmann T;Kleih SC;Staiger-Sälzer P;Desideri L;Hoogerwerf EJ;Mattia D
通讯作者: Mattia D
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01058
发表时间: 2019-10-16
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Freudenburg, Zachary, V;Branco, Mariana P.;Vansteensel, Mariska J.
通讯作者: Vansteensel, Mariska J.
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000158616.43002.6d
发表时间: 2005-05-24
期刊: NEUROLOGY
影响因子: 9.9
作者:
Kübler, A;Nijboer, F;Wolpaw, JR
通讯作者: Wolpaw, JR