Substrates of neuropsychological functioning in stimulant dependence: a review of functional neuroimaging research.
Substrates of neuropsychological functioning in stimulant dependence: a review of functional neuroimaging research.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/brb3.65
复制
发表时间:
2012-07
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
van den Brink, Wim
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crunelle, Cleo L.;Veltman, Dick J.;Booij, Jan;van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen, Katelijne;van den Brink, Wim
Stimulant dependence is associated with neuropsychological impairments. Here, we summarize and integrate the existing neuroimaging literature on the neural substrates of neuropsychological (dys)function in stimulant dependence, including cocaine, (meth-)amphetamine, ecstasy and nicotine dependence, and excessive caffeine use, comparing stimulant abusers (SAs) to nondrug using healthy controls (HCs). Despite some inconsistencies, most studies indicated altered brain activation in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and insula in response to reward and punishment, and higher limbic and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)/PFC activation during craving and attentional bias paradigms in SAs compared with HCs. Impulsivity in SAs was associated with lower ACC and presupplementary motor area activity compared with HCs, and related to both ventral (amygdala, ventrolateral PFC, insula) and dorsal (dorsolateral PFC, dorsal ACC, posterior parietal cortex) systems. Decision making in SAs was associated with low dorsolateral PFC activity and high orbitofrontal activity. Finally, executive function in SAs was associated with lower activation in frontotemporal regions and higher activation in premotor cortex compared with HCs. It is concluded that the lower activations compared with HCs are likely to reflect the neural substrate of impaired neurocognitive functions, whereas higher activations in SAs compared with HCs are likely to reflect compensatory cognitive control mechanisms to keep behavioral task performance to a similar level as in HCs. However, before final conclusions can be drawn, additional research is needed using neuroimaging in SAs and HCs using larger and more homogeneous samples as well as more comparable task paradigms, study designs, and statistical analyses.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Crews, Fulton Timm;Boettiger, Charlotte Ann
通讯作者:
Boettiger, Charlotte Ann
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Bustamante, Juan-Carlos;Barros-Loscertales, Alfonso;Avila, Cesar
通讯作者:
Avila, Cesar
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Bolla, KI;Eldreth, DA;Ernst, M
通讯作者:
Ernst, M
影响因子:
--
作者:
Adinoff, Bryon;Williams, Mark J;Devous, Michael D Sr
通讯作者:
Devous, Michael D Sr
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
Chen BT;Hopf FW;Bonci A
通讯作者:
Bonci A