Biobehavioral measures as outcomes: a cautionary tale.

Biobehavioral measures as outcomes: a cautionary tale.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3928/19404921-20131018-01
复制
发表时间:
2014-03
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Raff H
Raff H
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kovach CR;Woods DL;Devine EC;Logan BR;Raff H

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文讨论了使用生物行为措施作为医疗干预研究的结果。唾液皮质醇的效应量(ES)值,以及基于观察的疼痛和躁动的措施进行了检查。治疗前和治疗后的效果分别评估了有和没有急性精神病症状的疗养院(NH)居民。这项研究显示,在急性精神病症状组的疼痛和激越措施和小到中等的积极影响,这些相同的措施,在没有急性精神病症状组。在这两组中,ES值在皮质醇测量上并不一致。在确定一项指标是否可用于估计最小临床重要差异之前,必须考虑生物标志物是否对正在研究的人群和背景中的治疗有反应。
This article discusses the use of biobehavioral measures as outcomes for healthcare intervention studies. Effect size (ES) values for salivary cortisol, and observation-based measures of pain and agitation are examined. Effects pre to post treatment were assessed separately for nursing home (NH) residents with and without acute psychotic symptoms. This study revealed large positive effects on both pain and agitation measures in the group with acute psychotic symptoms and small-to-medium positive effects on these same measures in the group without acute psychotic symptoms. In both of these groups the ES values were not consistently positive on the cortisol measures. Prior to determining if a measure can be used to estimate minimum clinically important differences, it is essential to consider if the biomarker will be responsive to therapy in the populations and contexts being studied.
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4530(03)00054-4
发表时间: 2004-05-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Carlson, LE;Speca, M;Goodey, E
通讯作者: Goodey, E
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4530(02)00069-0
发表时间: 2003-08-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Gaab, J;Blättler, N;Ehlert, U
通讯作者: Ehlert, U
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-020331
发表时间: 2002-10-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Grottoli, S;Giordano, R;Arvat, E
通讯作者: Arvat, E
DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770150506
发表时间: 1992-10-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
HURLEY, AC;VOLICER, BJ;VOLICER, L
通讯作者: VOLICER, L
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026
发表时间: 2009-02-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Hellhammer, Dirk H.;Wuest, Stefan;Kudielka, Brigitte M.
通讯作者: Kudielka, Brigitte M.