Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
复制标题
X染色体上的密码子使用偏差和有效的人口大小与果蝇果蝇中的常染色体相比。
DOI:
10.1093/molbev/mss222
复制
发表时间:
2013-04
影响因子:
10.7
通讯作者:
Haddrill PR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Campos JL;Zeng K;Parker DJ;Charlesworth B;Haddrill PR
Codon usage bias (CUB) in Drosophila is higher for X-linked genes than for autosomal genes. One possible explanation is that the higher effective recombination rate for genes on the X chromosome compared with the autosomes reduces their susceptibility to Hill–Robertson effects, and thus enhances the efficacy of selection on codon usage. The genome sequence of D. melanogaster was used to test this hypothesis. Contrary to expectation, it was found that, after correcting for the effective recombination rate, CUB remained higher on the X than on the autosomes. In contrast, an analysis of polymorphism data from a Rwandan population showed that mean nucleotide site diversity at 4-fold degenerate sites for genes on the X is approximately three-quarters of the autosomal value after correcting for the effective recombination rate, compared with approximate equality before correction. In addition, these data show that selection for preferred versus unpreferred synonymous variants is stronger on the X than the autosomes, which accounts for the higher CUB of genes on the X chromosome. This difference in the strength of selection does not appear to reflect the effects of dominance of mutations affecting codon usage, differences in gene expression levels between X and autosomes, or differences in mutational bias. Its cause therefore remains unexplained. The stronger selection on CUB on the X chromosome leads to a lower rate of synonymous site divergence compared with the autosomes; this will cause a stronger upward bias for X than A in estimates of the proportion of nonsynonymous mutations fixed by positive selection, for methods based on the McDonald–Kreitman test.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Clark, Andrew G.;Eisen, Michael B.;MacCallum, Iain
通讯作者:
MacCallum, Iain
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.96.8.4482
发表时间:
1999-04-13
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Duret, L;Mouchiroud, D
通讯作者:
Mouchiroud, D
影响因子:
1.5
作者:
Charlesworth, B
通讯作者:
Charlesworth, B
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Fay, JC;Wyckoff, GJ;Wu, CI
通讯作者:
Wu, CI
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Hutter, Stephan;Li, Haipeng;Stephan, Wolfgang
通讯作者:
Stephan, Wolfgang