COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States: A Systematic Review.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States: A Systematic Review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpubh.2021.770985
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Pakpour AH
Pakpour AH
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yasmin F;Najeeb H;Moeed A;Naeem U;Asghar MS;Chughtai NU;Yousaf Z;Seboka BT;Ullah I;Lin CY;Pakpour AH

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在整个大流行期间,美国对疫苗的犹豫揭示了不一致的结果。这项系统性综述比较了美国各地的COVID-19疫苗接种情况,并调查了不同人群对疫苗犹豫不决和接受程度的预测因素。对PUBMED数据库进行了检索,直至2021年7月17日。筛选符合纳入标准的文章,并选择65项研究进行定量分析。总体疫苗接受率范围为12%至91.4%,使用10分量表的研究意愿范围为3.58至5.12。研究发现,对COVID-19疫苗的不愿性增加与黑人/非裔美国人相关。性别、种族、年龄、教育水平和收入状况被确定为COVID-19疫苗接种率低或高的决定因素。在两项研究中观察到美国人群的疫苗接受度发生了变化,2020年至2021年分别增加了10.8%和7.4%。我们的研究结果证实,犹豫存在于美国人口中,最高的黑人/非洲裔美国人,孕妇或哺乳期妇女,男性性别低。监管机构必须承认这些统计数据,并因此努力减轻未接种疫苗个人的负担,并根据全国各地不同的弱势亚群修订疫苗交付计划。
Vaccine hesitancy in the US throughout the pandemic has revealed inconsistent results. This systematic review has compared COVID-19 vaccine uptake across US and investigated predictors of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance across different groups. A search of PUBMED database was conducted till 17th July, 2021. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were screened and 65 studies were selected for a quantitative analysis. The overall vaccine acceptance rate ranged from 12 to 91.4%, the willingness of studies using the 10-point scale ranged from 3.58 to 5.12. Increased unwillingness toward COVID-19 vaccine and Black/African Americans were found to be correlated. Sex, race, age, education level, and income status were identified as determining factors of having a low or high COVID-19 vaccine uptake. A change in vaccine acceptance in the US population was observed in two studies, an increase of 10.8 and 7.4%, respectively, between 2020 and 2021. Our results confirm that hesitancy exists in the US population, highest in Black/African Americans, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and low in the male sex. It is imperative for regulatory bodies to acknowledge these statistics and consequently, exert efforts to mitigate the burden of unvaccinated individuals and revise vaccine delivery plans, according to different vulnerable subgroups, across the country.
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-021-09440-0
发表时间: 2021-06
期刊: HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues
影响因子: --
作者:
Bunch L
通讯作者: Bunch L
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248542
发表时间: 2021
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Doherty IA;Pilkington W;Brown L;Billings V;Hoffler U;Paulin L;Kimbro KS;Baker B;Zhang T;Locklear T;Robinson S;Kumar D
通讯作者: Kumar D
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113638
发表时间: 2021-03
期刊: Social science & medicine (1982)
影响因子: --
作者:
Callaghan T;Moghtaderi A;Lueck JA;Hotez P;Strych U;Dor A;Fowler EF;Motta M
通讯作者: Motta M
DOI: 10.7326/m20-3569
发表时间: 2020-12-15
影响因子: 39.2
作者:
Fisher, Kimberly A.;Bloomstone, Sarah J.;Mazor, Kathleen M.
通讯作者: Mazor, Kathleen M.
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06554-y
发表时间: 2021-05
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Greenhawt M;Kimball S;DunnGalvin A;Abrams EM;Shaker MS;Mosnaim G;Comberiati P;Nekliudov NA;Blyuss O;Teufel M;Munblit D
通讯作者: Munblit D