Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.
Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0026451
复制
发表时间：
2012-11
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Graziano, Kristen M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mirman, Daniel;Graziano, Kristen M.
关于单词和对象含义的知识可以根据共同的特征进行分类（水果、哺乳动物等），或者根据参与事件或场景进行主题（吃早餐、遛狗等）。一项眼球追踪研究表明，在理解单个口语单词的过程中，这两种知识都被激活了，即使听者不需要执行任何主动任务。结果进一步表明，个体对分类关系和主题关系的相对激活程度预示了个体在相似性判断任务中对分类关系和主题关系的偏好。这些结果表明，个体在分类和主题语义知识的相对优势上存在差异，并表明意义信息是在两个平行的、互补的语义系统中组织的。
Knowledge about word and object meanings can be organized taxonomically (fruits, mammals, etc.) based on shared features, or thematically (eating breakfast, taking a dog for a walk, etc.) based on participation in events or scenarios. An eye-tracking study showed that both kinds of knowledge are activated during comprehension of a single spoken word, even when the listener is not required to perform any active task. The results further revealed that an individual’s relative activation of taxonomic relations compared to thematic relations predicts that individual’s tendency to favor taxonomic over thematic relations when asked to choose between them in a similarity judgment task. These results argue that individuals differ in the relative strengths of their taxonomic and thematic semantic knowledge and suggest that meaning information is organized in two parallel, complementary semantic systems.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Hare M;Jones M;Thomson C;Kelly S;McRae K
通讯作者：
McRae K
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Crutch, Sebastian J.;Warrington, Elizabeth K.
通讯作者：
Warrington, Elizabeth K.
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Ralph, MAL;McClelland, JL;Hodges, JR
通讯作者：
Hodges, JR
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Mirman D;Magnuson JS
通讯作者：
Magnuson JS
DOI：
10.1016/b978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5
发表时间：
2011-01-01
期刊：
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND THEORY, VOL 54
影响因子：
--
作者：
Estes, Zachary;Golonka, Sabrina;Jones, Lara L.
通讯作者：
Jones, Lara L.