Fast quantitative three-dimensional ultrashort echo time (UTE) Cones magnetic resonance imaging of major tissues in the knee joint using extended sprial sampling.
Fast quantitative three-dimensional ultrashort echo time (UTE) Cones magnetic resonance imaging of major tissues in the knee joint using extended sprial sampling.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/nbm.4376
复制
发表时间:
2020-10
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Du J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wan L;Ma Y;Yang J;Jerban S;Searleman AC;Carl M;Le N;Chang EY;Tang G;Du J
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of extending the spiral sampling window on quantitative 3D UTE Cones imaging of major knee joint tissues including articular cartilage, menisci, tendons, and ligaments at 3T. Nine cadaveric human whole knee specimens were imaged on a 3T clinical MRI scanner. A series of quantitative 3D UTE Cones imaging biomarkers including T2*, T1, Adiabatic T1ρ, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and macromolecular fraction (MMF) were estimated using spiral sampling trajectories with various durations. Errors in UTE MRI biomarkers as a function of sampling time were evaluated using a non-stretched spiral trajectory as reference standard. No significant differences were observed by increasing the spiral sampling window from 1116 μs to 2232 μs in the calculated T2*, T1, Adiabatic T1ρ, MTR, and MMF, as all p-values were over 0.05 as assessed by ANOVA with two-sided Dunnett’s test. Although extending the sampling window results in signal loss for short T2 components, there was limited effect on the calculated quantitative biomarkers, with error percentages typically smaller than 5% in all evaluated tissues. The total scan time can be reduced by up to 54% with quantification errors less than 5% in any evaluated major tissue in the knee joint, suggesting that the 3D UTE Cones MRI techniques can be greatly accelerated by using a longer spiral sampling window without causing additional quantitative bias.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Jerban S;Nazaran A;Cheng X;Carl M;Szeverenyi N;Du J;Chang EY
通讯作者:
Chang EY
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Li C;Magland JF;Seifert AC;Wehrli FW
通讯作者:
Wehrli FW
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Gurney, PT;Hargreaves, BA;Nishimura, DG
通讯作者:
Nishimura, DG
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
Dournes, Gael;Grodzki, David;Laurent, Francois
通讯作者:
Laurent, Francois
影响因子:
27.4
作者:
Tan, A. L.;Toumi, H.;McGonagle, D.
通讯作者:
McGonagle, D.