Amodal aspects of linguistic design.

Amodal aspects of linguistic design.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0060617
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Brentari D
Brentari D
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Berent I;Dupuis A;Brentari D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

所有口头语言都会编码Sylables并限制其内部结构。美国的手语(ASL)。在新的ASL迹象中,我们的限制(但不是词素)关于Sylable结构,限制了非签名者从经验中学习的能力。他们还学会了在类似语素的单元中部分地忽略它,这是非自然的规则,该规则未自然地通过握手来定义Sylable,这表明他们无法忽略识别Sylables的运动。 Sylables受到共同的语音限制,这些限制在新的模式中限制了语音学习。
All spoken languages encode syllables and constrain their internal structure. But whether these restrictions concern the design of the language system, broadly, or speech, specifically, remains unknown. To address this question, here, we gauge the structure of signed syllables in American Sign Language (ASL). Like spoken languages, signed syllables must exhibit a single sonority/energy peak (i.e., movement). Four experiments examine whether this restriction is enforced by signers and nonsigners. We first show that Deaf ASL signers selectively apply sonority restrictions to syllables (but not morphemes) in novel ASL signs. We next examine whether this principle might further shape the representation of signed syllables by nonsigners. Absent any experience with ASL, nonsigners used movement to define syllable-like units. Moreover, the restriction on syllable structure constrained the capacity of nonsigners to learn from experience. Given brief practice that implicitly paired syllables with sonority peaks (i.e., movement)—a natural phonological constraint attested in every human language—nonsigners rapidly learned to selectively rely on movement to define syllables and they also learned to partly ignore it in the identification of morpheme-like units. Remarkably, nonsigners failed to learn an unnatural rule that defines syllables by handshape, suggesting they were unable to ignore movement in identifying syllables. These findings indicate that signed and spoken syllables are subject to a shared phonological restriction that constrains phonological learning in a new modality. These conclusions suggest the design of the phonological system is partly amodal.
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.3.747
发表时间: 2010-04-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Best, Catherine T.;Mathur, Gaurav;Lillo-Martin, Diane
通讯作者: Lillo-Martin, Diane
DOI: 10.1207/s15473341lld0203_1
发表时间: 2006-01-01
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Baker, Stephanie;Golinkoff, Roberta;Petitto, Laura-Ann
通讯作者: Petitto, Laura-Ann
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00016-4
发表时间: 1997-07-01
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Berent, I;Shimron, J
通讯作者: Shimron, J
DOI: 10.1075/ml.1.2.03ber
发表时间: 2006-01-01
期刊: MENTAL LEXICON
影响因子: 0.6
作者:
Berent, Iris;Tzelgov, Joseph;Bibi, Uri
通讯作者: Bibi, Uri
DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2011.580676
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
Berent I;Harder K;Lennertz T
通讯作者: Lennertz T