Kinetics of the Cellular and Transcriptomic Response to Eimeria maxima in Relatively Resistant and Susceptible Chicken Lines.
Kinetics of the Cellular and Transcriptomic Response to Eimeria maxima in Relatively Resistant and Susceptible Chicken Lines.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3389/fimmu.2021.653085
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
7.3
通讯作者:
Vervelde L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bremner A;Kim S;Morris KM;Nolan MJ;Borowska D;Wu Z;Tomley F;Blake DP;Hawken R;Kaiser P;Vervelde L
Eimeria maxima is a common cause of coccidiosis in chickens, a disease that has a huge economic impact on poultry production. Knowledge of immunity to E. maxima and the specific mechanisms that contribute to differing levels of resistance observed between chicken breeds and between congenic lines derived from a single breed of chickens is required. This study aimed to define differences in the kinetics of the immune response of two inbred lines of White Leghorn chickens that exhibit differential resistance (line C.B12) or susceptibility (line 15I) to infection by E. maxima. Line C.B12 and 15I chickens were infected with E. maxima and transcriptome analysis of jejunal tissue was performed at 2, 4, 6 and 8 days post-infection (dpi). RNA-Seq analysis revealed differences in the rapidity and magnitude of cytokine transcription responses post-infection between the two lines. In particular, IFN-γ and IL-10 transcript expression increased in the jejunum earlier in line C.B12 (at 4 dpi) compared to line 15I (at 6 dpi). Line C.B12 chickens exhibited increases of IFNG and IL10 mRNA in the jejunum at 4 dpi, whereas in line 15I transcription was delayed but increased to a greater extent. RT-qPCR and ELISAs confirmed the results of the transcriptomic study. Higher serum IL-10 correlated strongly with higher E. maxima replication in line 15I compared to line C.B12 chickens. Overall, the findings suggest early induction of the IFN-γ and IL-10 responses, as well as immune-related genes including IL21 at 4 dpi identified by RNA-Seq, may be key to resistance to E. maxima.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Haritova, A. M.;Stanilova, S. A.
通讯作者:
Stanilova, S. A.
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Del Cacho E;Gallego M;Lillehoj HS;Quílez J;Lillehoj EP;Ramo A;Sánchez-Acedo C
通讯作者:
Sánchez-Acedo C
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Blake DP;Billington KJ;Copestake SL;Oakes RD;Quail MA;Wan KL;Shirley MW;Smith AL
通讯作者:
Smith AL
影响因子:
4
作者:
Clark EL;Macdonald SE;Thenmozhi V;Kundu K;Garg R;Kumar S;Ayoade S;Fornace KM;Jatau ID;Moftah A;Nolan MJ;Sudhakar NR;Adebambo AO;Lawal IA;Álvarez Zapata R;Awuni JA;Chapman HD;Karimuribo E;Mugasa CM;Namangala B;Rushton J;Suo X;Thangaraj K;Srinivasa Rao AS;Tewari AK;Banerjee PS;Dhinakar Raj G;Raman M;Tomley FM;Blake DP
通讯作者:
Blake DP
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Jeurissen, SHM;Janse, EM;Vervelde, L
通讯作者:
Vervelde, L