Scalar Diversity, Negative Strengthening, and Adjectival Semantics.

Scalar Diversity, Negative Strengthening, and Adjectival Semantics.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01659
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Benz A
Benz A
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gotzner N;Solt S;Benz A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

先前的研究已经证明了在不同触发条件下标量推理的速率存在很大的差异(Doran等人,;货车蒂尔等人)。在目前的研究中,我们表明,变异比以前认为的更系统。特别是,我们提出的实验证据表明,等级含义(i)的认可与较强等级伙伴的负强化程度(例如,约翰是不是惊人的被解释为传达约翰是相当丑陋的)和(ii)受规模结构和基本的标量语义的分级形容词(特别是有界性,极性,形容词的extremeness)。总的来说,我们的研究表明,规模结构应考虑到在理论的含义。
Previous research has demonstrated great variability in the rates of scalar inferences across different triggers (Doran et al.,; van Tiel et al.,). In the current study, we show that variation is more systematic than previously thought. In particular, we present experimental evidence suggesting that endorsements of scalar implicatures (i) are anti-correlated with the degree of negative strengthening of the stronger scale-mate (e.g., whether John is not stunning is interpreted as conveying that John is rather ugly) and (ii) are affected by the scale structure and the underlying scalar semantics of gradable adjectives (in particular boundedness, polarity, and adjectival extremeness). Overall, our research suggests that scale structure should be taken into account in theories of implicature.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.005
发表时间: 2009-08-01
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois;Feeney, Aidan;Villejoubert, Gaelle
通讯作者: Villejoubert, Gaelle
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90010-4
发表时间: 1980-01-01
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
RIPS, LJ;TURNBULL, W
通讯作者: TURNBULL, W
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.151
发表时间: 2017-10-20
影响因子: 1
作者:
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas;Verheyen, Steven;Spector, Benjamin
通讯作者: Spector, Benjamin
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2012.0008
发表时间: 2012-03-01
期刊: LANGUAGE
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Doran, Ryan;Ward, Gregory;Baker, Rachel E.
通讯作者: Baker, Rachel E.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.004
发表时间: 2008-01-01
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Frazier, Lyn;Clifton, Charles, Jr.;Stolterfoht, Britta
通讯作者: Stolterfoht, Britta