Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/ajmg.a.34414
复制
发表时间:
2012-05
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Ross, Lainie Friedman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lemke, Amy A.;Halverson, Colin;Ross, Lainie Friedman
关键词:
To be respectful of the public, biobank guiding principles and operations should be responsive to and inclusive of the values and beliefs of their participants. In an effort to increase knowledge and inform institutional policies, we conducted a deliberative engagement of individuals from two healthcare facilities in South Side Chicago that serve different socioeconomic communities to consider biobank policies regarding return of research results. We recruited primary caregivers of children receiving care at either a Federally Qualified Health Center or a university-based practice to attend two full-day deliberative engagement sessions, which included four educational presentations followed by focus group discussions. Surveys were administered to assess attitudes before and after the engagement, and an evaluation was conducted to assess the deliberative engagement process. All 45 participants self-identified as African American. Focus group themes included: 1) overall interest in biobank participation, broad consent, and recontact; 2) root causes of distrust and potential biobank strategies to facilitate trust; 3) perceived positive and negative aspects of receiving research results; and 4) strong interest in receiving and managing their children’s research results. Survey data indicated the same degree of interest in receiving results about themselves as about their children. Pre- and post-session findings showed mainly non-significant attitudinal changes in level of interest in biobank participation and return of research results, although there was a decrease in level of concern regarding identification from research data. Our findings reveal shared community insights important in facilitating relationships and policy discussions between biobank researchers and research participants.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Hsieh, HF;Shannon, SE
通讯作者:
Shannon, SE
DOI:
10.1177/1740774510373497
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
Clinical trials (London, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Hilner JE;Perdue LH;Sides EG;Pierce JJ;Wägner AM;Aldrich A;Loth A;Albret L;Wagenknecht LE;Nierras C;Akolkar B;T1DGC
通讯作者:
T1DGC
DOI:
10.1097/gim.0b013e3181cd6689
发表时间:
2010-02
期刊:
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bussey-Jones J;Garrett J;Henderson G;Moloney M;Blumenthal C;Corbie-Smith G
通讯作者:
Corbie-Smith G
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Jonassaint, Charles R.;Santos, Eunice R.;Royal, Charmaine D.
通讯作者:
Royal, Charmaine D.
DOI:
10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.3
发表时间:
2009-12
期刊:
Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kim SY;Wall IF;Stanczyk A;De Vries R
通讯作者:
De Vries R