Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?

Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0015849
复制
发表时间:
2009-07
影响因子:
22.4
通讯作者:
Johnson, Marcia K.
Johnson, Marcia K.
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mitchell, Karen J.;Johnson, Marcia K.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对源记忆的系统研究提供了一种有用的方法来研究赋予记忆情景特征的特征,连接特征的联想、组织或结合过程,以及将当前心理体验归因于过去事件记忆所涉及的获取和评估过程。这篇综述说明了神经成像如何有助于我们理解与源记忆有关的大脑机制。主要关注功能性磁共振成像(fMRI),我们回顾了关于内侧颞叶、前额叶皮层、后表征区和顶叶皮层在源记忆中的作用的证据。我们还考虑了评估情景记忆、情感信息的编码和记忆以及错误记忆的定性特征的相关研究,以及对一些显示源记忆中断的人群(老年人、抑郁症患者、创伤后应激障碍患者或精神分裂症患者)的研究。尽管仍有大量的工作要做,功能性神经成像正在兑现其推进我们对源记忆的理解的承诺。认知理论(如源监测框架所示)与系统认知神经影像学研究的证据之间持续的双向互动,将有助于进一步阐明我们对认知过程(如特征绑定、检索、监测)、先验知识(如语义、图式)和特定特征(如感知和情感信息)的概念化,以及它们如何结合起来创造真实和虚假的记忆。
The systematic study of source memory provides a useful approach to investigating the features that give memories their episodic character, the associative, organizational, or binding processes that connect features, and the access and evaluation processes involved in attributing current mental experiences to memories of past events. This review illustrates how neuroimaging is contributing to our understanding of the brain mechanisms involved in source memory. Focusing primarily on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we review evidence regarding the roles of various subregions of the medial temporal lobes, prefrontal cortex, posterior representational areas, and parietal cortex in source memory. We also consider relevant studies assessing the qualitative characteristics of episodic memories, the encoding and remembering of emotional information, and false memories, as well as studies of several populations that show disrupted source memory (older adults, individuals with depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, or schizophrenia). Although there is still substantial work to be done, functional neuroimaging is making good on its promise to advance our understanding of source memory. A continued two-way interaction between cognitive theory, as illustrated by the Source Monitoring Framework, and evidence from systematic cognitive neuroimaging studies should help further clarify our conceptualization of cognitive processes (e.g., feature binding, retrieval, monitoring), prior knowledge (e.g., semantics, schemas), and specific features (e.g., perceptual and emotional information), and of how they combine to create true and false memories.
DOI: 10.3109/00207459608986350
发表时间: 1996-01-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Bleich, A;Attias, J;Furman, V
通讯作者: Furman, V
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.548
发表时间: 1990-10-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
BATCHELDER, WH;RIEFER, DM
通讯作者: RIEFER, DM
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.2.177
发表时间: 2008-03-01
期刊: NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Anderson, Nicole D.;Jennings, Janine M.;Graham, Simon J.
通讯作者: Graham, Simon J.
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10215
发表时间: 2004-01-01
期刊: HIPPOCAMPUS
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Addis, DR;Moscovitch, M;McAndrews, MP
通讯作者: McAndrews, MP
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.769
发表时间: 2008-07-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Awipi, T.;Davachi, L.
通讯作者: Davachi, L.