Increasing contributions of airborne route in SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant transmission compared with the ancestral strain.
Increasing contributions of airborne route in SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant transmission compared with the ancestral strain.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109328
复制
发表时间:
2022-08-01
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Lei, Hao
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ji, Shuyi;Xiao, Shenglan;Wang, Huaibin;Lei, Hao
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant has become the dominant lineage worldwide. Experimental studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is more stable on various environmental surfaces than the ancestral strains of SARS-CoV-2. However, the influences on the role of the contact route in SARS-CoV-2 transmission are still unknown. In this study, we built a Markov chain model to simulate the transmission of the Omicron and ancestral strains of SARS-CoV-2 within a household over a 1-day period from multiple pathways; that is, airborne, droplet, and contact routes. We assumed that there were two adults and one child in the household, and that one of the adults was infected with SARS-CoV-2. We assumed two scenarios. (1) Asymptomatic/presymptomatic infection, and (2) symptomatic infection. During asymptomatic/presymptomatic infection, the contact route contributing the most (37%–45%), followed by the airborne (34%–38%) and droplet routes (21%–28%). During symptomatic infection, the droplet route was the dominant pathway (48%–71%), followed by the contact route (25%–42%), with the airborne route playing a negligible role (<10%). Compared to the ancestral strain, although the contribution of the contact route increased in Omicron variant transmission, the increase was slight, from 25%–41% to 30%–45%. With the growing concern about the increase in the proportion of asymptomatic/presymptomatic infection in Omicron strain transmissions, the airborne route, rather than the fomite route, should be of focus. Our findings suggest the importance of ventilation in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant prevention in building environment.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Dumont-Leblond N;Veillette M;Bhérer L;Boissoneault K;Mubareka S;Yip L;Dubuis ME;Longtin Y;Jouvet P;McGeer A;Duchaine C
通讯作者:
Duchaine C
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Hou, Yixuan J.;Okuda, Kenichi;Baric, Ralph S.
通讯作者:
Baric, Ralph S.
DOI:
10.3390/v14030533
发表时间:
2022-03-04
期刊:
Viruses
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kim D;Ali ST;Kim S;Jo J;Lim JS;Lee S;Ryu S
通讯作者:
Ryu S
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Bao, Linlin;Gao, Hong;Qin, Chuan
通讯作者:
Qin, Chuan
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Lei, Hao;Wu, Xifeng;Shu, Yuelong
通讯作者:
Shu, Yuelong