Virtual and actual: relative accuracy of on-site and web-based instruments in auditing the environment for physical activity.
Virtual and actual: relative accuracy of on-site and web-based instruments in auditing the environment for physical activity.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.11.001
复制
发表时间：
2013-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Troped PJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ben-Joseph E;Lee JS;Cromley EK;Laden F;Troped PJ
评估网络工具在评估和测量街道尺度建筑环境特征方面的相对准确性和实用性。使用一种著名的审计工具，通过实地访问和三种网络工具，对马萨诸塞州波士顿大都市边缘的84个街道段进行了评估。对这些评估进行了比较，以评价其相对准确性和实用性。基于谷歌地图、谷歌街景和MS Visual Oblique的基于网络的审计往往与关于土地使用和交通特征的现场审计非常一致（例如，建筑物类型、商业目的地和街道）。然而，这两种方法来进行审计（网络与现场）往往同意只有微弱的细粒度，时间和质量的环境因素。在使用的网络工具中，审计人员将MS Visual Oblique评为最有价值的工具。然而，街景往往被评为最有用的测量细粒度的功能，如水平和条件的人行道。虽然基于网络的工具不能完美地替代现场审计，但它们允许从远程地点准确地进行初步审计，可能节省时间和费用，并提高随后现场访问的有效性。
To assess the relative accuracy and usefulness of web tools in evaluating and measuring street-scale built environment characteristics. A well-known audit tool was used to evaluate 84 street segments at the urban edge of metropolitan Boston, Massachusetts, using on-site visits and three web-based tools. The assessments were compared to evaluate their relative accuracy and usefulness. Web-based audits, based-on Google Maps, Google Street View, and MS Visual Oblique, tend to strongly agree with on-site audits on land-use and transportation characteristics (e.g., types of buildings, commercial destinations, and streets). However, the two approaches to conducting audits (web versus on-site) tend to agree only weakly on fine-grain, temporal, and qualitative environmental elements. Among the web tools used, auditors rated MS Visual Oblique as the most valuable. Yet Street View tends to be rated as the most useful in measuring fine-grain features, such as levelness and condition of sidewalks. While web-based tools do not offer a perfect substitute for on-site audits, they allow for preliminary audits to be performed accurately from remote locations, potentially saving time and cost and increasing the effectiveness of subsequent on-site visits.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Rundle AG;Bader MD;Richards CA;Neckerman KM;Teitler JO
通讯作者：
Teitler JO
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Moudon, AV;Lee, C
通讯作者：
Lee, C
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Hoehner, CM;Ramirez, LKB;Brownson, RC
通讯作者：
Brownson, RC
DOI：
10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x
发表时间：
2010-12-01
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Badland, Hannah M.;Opit, Simon;Mavoa, Suzanne
通讯作者：
Mavoa, Suzanne
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Ewing, Reid;Handy, Susan;Winston, Emily
通讯作者：
Winston, Emily