A comparison of conversion rates, clinical profiles and predictors of outcomes in two independent samples of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis in China.
A comparison of conversion rates, clinical profiles and predictors of outcomes in two independent samples of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis in China.
复制标题
中国精神病临床高风险个体的两个独立样本的转化率、临床特征和结果预测因子的比较
DOI:
10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.029
复制
发表时间:
2018-07
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Wang J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li H;Zhang T;Xu L;Tang Y;Cui H;Wei Y;Tang X;Woodberry KA;Shapiro DI;Li C;Seidman LJ;Wang J
In a previous epidemiological study, we reported on the ascertainment and outcomes of “clinical high risk” (CHR) individuals at the Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC, “2011 cohort”). The current study compares demographic and clinical characteristics, including conversion rates, of this sample with a subsequently recruited, independent CHR sample and with published data from western samples. A new sample of 100 CHR subjects (“2013 cohort”) was selected based on screening and semi-structured interviews. Both studies used the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) for CHR assessment and conducted a naturalistic two-year follow-up. The two cohorts were compared on conversion rates, demographic and clinical characteristics, psychosis risk symptoms, and risk factors for psychotic conversion. Ninety one (91%) of the 2013 cohort subjects completed the clinical two-year follow-up and 25 (27.5% of the 91) converted to a psychotic disorder over the follow-up period. A comparison of conversions to full psychosis between the 2013 and the 2011 cohorts showed no significant difference in time to conversion (Pairwise comparison: χ2 = 0.3, p = 0.562). Both cohort studies showed that CHR subjects with more severe clinical symptoms at baseline and decline in functioning were more likely to convert to psychosis. Conversion rates in this new, independent Chinese sample are similar to those reported in non-Chinese samples and to the 2011 cohort. Future research is needed to examine whether the implementation of early intervention for CHR/prodromal symptoms reduces the risk of psychosis and decreases the conversion rate.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2
作者:
Wiltink, Suzanne;Velthorst, Eva;Yung, Alison R.
通讯作者:
Yung, Alison R.
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Lemos-Giraldez, Serafin;Vallina-Fernandez, Oscar;Angel Ortega-Ferrandez, Jose
通讯作者:
Angel Ortega-Ferrandez, Jose
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Yung, Alison R.;Nelson, Barnaby;McGorry, Patrick D.
通讯作者:
McGorry, Patrick D.
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Ising, Helga K.;Kraan, Tamar C.;van der Gaag, Mark
通讯作者:
van der Gaag, Mark
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Zhang T;Li H;Woodberry KA;Seidman LJ;Zheng L;Li H;Zhao S;Tang Y;Guo Q;Lu X;Zhuo K;Qian Z;Chow A;Li C;Jiang K;Xiao Z;Wang J
通讯作者:
Wang J