Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review.
Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1289/ehp.1104194
复制
发表时间：
2012-05
影响因子：
10.4
通讯作者：
Pattanayak SK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lewis JJ;Pattanayak SK
背景资料：全球对改进型炉灶（ICS）和清洁燃料的关注有所增加，因为它们有可能带来三重红利：家庭健康、当地环境质量和区域气候效益。然而，ICS和清洁燃料传播方案的采用率很低。目的：我们回顾了ICSs和燃料选择的实证研究，描述文献，研究燃料和炉灶选择的决定因素，并确定知识差距。方法：我们对发展中国家家庭采用ICS或清洁燃料的文献进行了系统回顾。结果通过简单的计票荟萃分析合成。结果如下：我们确定了32项研究，报告了146项独立的ICS采用（11项分析）或燃料选择（135项分析）回归分析，来自亚洲（60%），非洲（27%）和拉丁美洲（19%）。大多数研究采用多元回归方法来考虑7-13个选择的决定因素。收入，教育和城市位置与大多数（但不是所有）研究中的收养呈正相关。然而，燃料供应和价格、家庭规模和组成以及性别的影响尚不清楚。信贷、供应链强化和社会营销等潜在的重要驱动因素被忽视了。结论：ICSs或清洁能源的采用研究是稀缺的，分散的，不同的质量，即使全球分销计划正在迅速扩大。未来的研究应该检查一组扩大的上下文变量，以改善炉灶计划的实施，可以实现与这些技术相关的健康，当地环境质量和气候的“三赢”。
Background: The global focus on improved cookstoves (ICSs) and clean fuels has increased because of their potential for delivering triple dividends: household health, local environmental quality, and regional climate benefits. However, ICS and clean fuel dissemination programs have met with low rates of adoption. Objectives: We reviewed empirical studies on ICSs and fuel choice to describe the literature, examine determinants of fuel and stove choice, and identify knowledge gaps. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the adoption of ICSs or cleaner fuels by households in developing countries. Results are synthesized through a simple vote-counting meta-analysis. Results: We identified 32 research studies that reported 146 separate regression analyses of ICS adoption (11 analyses) or fuel choice (135 analyses) from Asia (60%), Africa (27%), and Latin America (19%). Most studies apply multivariate regression methods to consider 7–13 determinants of choice. Income, education, and urban location were positively associated with adoption in most but not all studies. However, the influence of fuel availability and prices, household size and composition, and sex is unclear. Potentially important drivers such as credit, supply-chain strengthening, and social marketing have been ignored. Conclusions: Adoption studies of ICSs or clean energy are scarce, scattered, and of differential quality, even though global distribution programs are quickly expanding. Future research should examine an expanded set of contextual variables to improve implementation of stove programs that can realize the “win-win-win” of health, local environmental quality, and climate associated with these technologies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.9
作者：
Amacher, GS;Hyde, WF;Kanel, KR
通讯作者：
Kanel, KR
影响因子：
9
作者：
Campbell, BM;Vermeulen, SJ;Mabugu, R
通讯作者：
Mabugu, R
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Edwards, JHY;Langpap, C
通讯作者：
Langpap, C
影响因子：
9
作者：
Adkins, Edwin;Eapen, Sandy;Modi, Vijay
通讯作者：
Modi, Vijay
影响因子：
7
作者：
Chen, L;Heerink, N;van den Berg, M
通讯作者：
van den Berg, M