Video games as a means to reduce age-related cognitive decline: attitudes, compliance, and effectiveness.
Video games as a means to reduce age-related cognitive decline: attitudes, compliance, and effectiveness.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00031
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Charness N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Boot WR;Champion M;Blakely DP;Wright T;Souders DJ;Charness N
最近的研究表明，视频游戏对感知和认知能力有广泛的好处。这些广泛的改善表明，基于视频游戏的认知干预可能是对抗与年龄增长相关的许多感知和认知下降的理想方法。此外，与其他认知干预相比，游戏干预有可能诱导更高的干预依从率，因为它们被认为是内在的愉快和激励。我们在一项干预措施中探讨了这些问题，该措施测试了动作游戏和“大脑健康”游戏提高各种能力的能力。认知能力没有显著改善，这表明在推荐视频游戏干预作为减少认知老化影响的手段时要谨慎。然而，游戏预期产生最大的利益，根据以前的文献（动作游戏）诱导最低的干预依从性。我们解释了这种低依从性的参与者的评级的动作游戏作为不太愉快，并通过他们的预测，培训将有一些有意义的好处。尽管没有认知结果，但数据为老年人愿意玩的视频游戏类型以及原因提供了有价值的见解。
Recent research has demonstrated broad benefits of video game play to perceptual and cognitive abilities. These broad improvements suggest that video game-based cognitive interventions may be ideal to combat the many perceptual and cognitive declines associated with advancing age. Furthermore, game interventions have the potential to induce higher rates of intervention compliance compared to other cognitive interventions as they are assumed to be inherently enjoyable and motivating. We explored these issues in an intervention that tested the ability of an action game and a “brain fitness” game to improve a variety of abilities. Cognitive abilities did not significantly improve, suggesting caution when recommending video game interventions as a means to reduce the effects of cognitive aging. However, the game expected to produce the largest benefit based on previous literature (an action game) induced the lowest intervention compliance. We explain this low compliance by participants’ ratings of the action game as less enjoyable and by their prediction that training would have few meaningful benefits. Despite null cognitive results, data provide valuable insights into the types of video games older adults are willing to play and why.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Basak, Chandramallika;Boot, Walter R.;Voss, Michelle W.;Kramer, Arthur F.
通讯作者：
Kramer, Arthur F.
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Clark, Kait;Fleck, Mathias S.;Mitroff, Stephen R.
通讯作者：
Mitroff, Stephen R.
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1465
发表时间：
2006-12-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Green, C. Shawn;Bavelier, Daphne
通讯作者：
Bavelier, Daphne
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Granek, Joshua A.;Gorbet, Diana J.;Sergio, Lauren E.
通讯作者：
Sergio, Lauren E.
使用还是失去它？ Wii大脑运动练习和域知识的阅读。
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Ackerman, Phillip L.;Kanfer, Ruth;Calderwood, Charles
通讯作者：
Calderwood, Charles