Sensory temporal sampling in time: an integrated model of the TSF and neural noise hypothesis as an etiological pathway for dyslexia.
Sensory temporal sampling in time: an integrated model of the TSF and neural noise hypothesis as an etiological pathway for dyslexia.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fnhum.2023.1294941
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Hoeft, Fumiko
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lasnick, Oliver H. M.;Hoeft, Fumiko
关键词：
在近年来，对发育迟缓的因果机制的研究已经取得了很多进展，谨慎地进化了对诵读困难的“时间抽样”，而神经遗传学和新型成像方法的贡献都导致了对该疾病的更为复杂的病因。 。但是，从基因水平到行为的表现，其相对新颖性（在2017年出版）意味着，重点是特定预测的经验研究。神经噪声假设和讨论这两种阅读障碍的观点。
Much progress has been made in research on the causal mechanisms of developmental dyslexia. In recent years, the “temporal sampling” account of dyslexia has evolved considerably, with contributions from neurogenetics and novel imaging methods resulting in a much more complex etiological view of the disorder. The original temporal sampling framework implicates disrupted neural entrainment to speech as a causal factor for atypical phonological representations. Yet, empirical findings have not provided clear evidence of a low-level etiology for this endophenotype. In contrast, the neural noise hypothesis presents a theoretical view of the manifestation of dyslexia from the level of genes to behavior. However, its relative novelty (published in 2017) means that empirical research focused on specific predictions is sparse. The current paper reviews dyslexia research using a dual framework from the temporal sampling and neural noise hypotheses and discusses the complementary nature of these two views of dyslexia. We present an argument for an integrated model of sensory temporal sampling as an etiological pathway for dyslexia. Finally, we conclude with a brief discussion of outstanding questions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Murphy E;Benítez-Burraco A
通讯作者：
Benítez-Burraco A
影响因子：
13.9
作者：
Buzsáki G;Wang XJ
通讯作者：
Wang XJ
影响因子：
3
作者：
Basar, E;Basar-Eroglu, C;Schürmann, M
通讯作者：
Schürmann, M
诵读困难和孤立的拼写缺陷的儿童的白质改变和区域横向化。
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Banfi C;Koschutnig K;Moll K;Schulte-Körne G;Fink A;Landerl K
通讯作者：
Landerl K
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Pammer K
通讯作者：
Pammer K