Higher COVID-19 Vaccination And Narrower Disparities In US Cities With Paid Sick Leave Compared To Those Without.

Higher COVID-19 Vaccination And Narrower Disparities In US Cities With Paid Sick Leave Compared To Those Without.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00779
复制
发表时间:
2022-11
期刊:
影响因子:
9.7
通讯作者:
Bilal, Usama
Bilal, Usama
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schnake-Mahl, Alina S.;O'Leary, Gabriella;Mullachery, Pricila H.;Skinner, Alexandra;Kolker, Jennifer;Roux, Ana V. Diez;Raifman, Julia R.;Bilal, Usama

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

带薪病假为工人提供带薪休假,以接种COVID-19疫苗并从潜在的疫苗副作用中恢复过来。我们假设,有带薪病假的城市将有更高的COVID-19疫苗接种覆盖率和更小的差异。利用2021年美国37个大城市的县级疫苗接种和带薪病假数据,我们估计了城市一级带薪病假政策与工作年龄人口疫苗接种覆盖率之间的关系,并使用≥65岁人口的覆盖率作为负对照重复分析。我们还研究了社区社会脆弱性的关联。实行带薪病假政策的城市的疫苗接种覆盖率比不实行带薪病假政策的城市高17%。我们发现,在社会最脆弱的社区,与最不脆弱的社区相比,带薪病假和疫苗接种之间的联系更强,而在65岁及以下的人群中没有联系。带薪病假政策与更高的COVID-19疫苗接种覆盖率和缩小差距有关。增加获得带薪病假政策的机会可能有助于增加疫苗接种并减少覆盖面的不平等。
Paid sick leave provides workers with paid time-off to receive COVID-19 vaccines and to recover from potential vaccine side effects. We hypothesized that cities with paid sick leave would have higher COVID-19 vaccination coverage and narrower disparities. Using county-level vaccination and paid sick leave data from 37 large US cities in 2021, we estimated the association between city-level paid sick leave policies and vaccination coverage in the working-age population, and repeated the analysis using coverage in the population aged ≥65 as a negative control. We additionally examined associations by neighborhood social vulnerability. Cities with a paid sick leave policy had 17% higher vaccination coverage than cities without a paid sick leave policy. We found stronger associations between paid sick leave and vaccination in the most socially vulnerable neighborhoods compared to the least ones, and no association in the population for the population 65 and under. Paid sick leave policies are associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination coverage and narrower disparities. Increasing access to paid sick leave policies may help increase vaccination and reduce inequities in coverage.
DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.4.1017-9124r2
发表时间: 2022-07
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
Callison, Kevin;Pesko, Michael F.
通讯作者: Pesko, Michael F.
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181d61eeb
发表时间: 2010-05
期刊: Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Lipsitch M;Tchetgen Tchetgen E;Cohen T
通讯作者: Cohen T
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105259
发表时间: 2020-09-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Khan, Mariam S.
通讯作者: Khan, Mariam S.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107670118
发表时间: 2021-07-20
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Jelliffe E;Pangburn P;Pichler S;Ziebarth NR
通讯作者: Ziebarth NR
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2035389
发表时间: 2021-02-04
期刊: The New England journal of medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
Baden LR;El Sahly HM;Essink B;Kotloff K;Frey S;Novak R;Diemert D;Spector SA;Rouphael N;Creech CB;McGettigan J;Khetan S;Segall N;Solis J;Brosz A;Fierro C;Schwartz H;Neuzil K;Corey L;Gilbert P;Janes H;Follmann D;Marovich M;Mascola J;Polakowski L;Ledgerwood J;Graham BS;Bennett H;Pajon R;Knightly C;Leav B;Deng W;Zhou H;Han S;Ivarsson M;Miller J;Zaks T;COVE Study Group
通讯作者: COVE Study Group