An Indicator of environmental enrichment to measure physical, social and cognitive activities in human daily life.
An Indicator of environmental enrichment to measure physical, social and cognitive activities in human daily life.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12888-022-03952-w
复制
发表时间：
2022-04-25
期刊：
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Fresan, Ana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Flores-Ramos, Monica;Yoldi-Negrete, Maria;Guiza-Zayas, Rodrigo;Ramirez-Rodriguez, Gerardo-Bernabe;Montes-Castrejon, Adolfo;Fresan, Ana
环境丰富（EE）的概念包括复杂的物理，社会，认知，运动和体感刺激，个体差异暴露。包括这些要素的EE指标将通过允许简单和可比的测量来促进EE在不同临床环境中的影响的研究。本研究的目的是建立和测试这样一个EE指标的基础上，佛罗里达认知活动量表（FCAS），多维社会融合在以后的生活量表（SILLS），和国际体力活动问卷（IPAQ）。在这项横断面比较研究中，招募了重度抑郁症患者和对照组。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAM-D）评估抑郁症状的严重程度。EE指标用于评估认知，社会和身体活动。我们将样本分为三个层次的认知和社会活动，以构建一个EE指标，并比较了参与者与重性抑郁症和对照组之间的得分。结果：40例抑郁症患者和50例正常对照者被纳入研究。较高的HAM-D评分与较低的EE水平相关。认知和社会项目表现出足够的可靠性。对照组在所有三项活动中的得分都较高，除了一些体育活动项目。EE的这一指标明显区分了重度抑郁症患者和对照组。FCAS、SILLS和IPAQ联合使用可以有效地评价EE，该EE指标可作为临床实践中的一个有用工具。横断面设计和样本量小是本研究的局限性。
The concept of environmental enrichment (EE) encompasses complex physical, social, cognitive, motor, and somatosensory stimuli to which individuals are differentially exposed. An indicator of EE comprising these elements would facilitate the study of the impact of EE in diverse clinical settings by allowing an easy and comparable measurement. This study aimed to create and test such an EE indicator based on the Florida Cognitive Activities Scale (FCAS), the Multidimensional Social Integration in Later Life Scale (SILLS), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Participants with major depression and control subjects were recruited in this cross-sectional comparative study. Depressive symptom severity was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The EE indicator was used to evaluate cognitive, social, and physical activity. We divided the sample into three levels of cognitive and social activities to construct an EE indicator and compared the obtained scores between participants with major depression and control subjects. Results: 40 patients suffering from major depression and 50 control subjects were included. Higher HAM-D scores were associated with lower EE levels. Cognitive and social items exhibited adequate reliability. Control subjects reported higher scores in all three activities evaluated, except for some items of physical activities. This indicator of EE clearly differentiated between participants with major depression from control subjects. FCAS, SILLS, and IPAQ used together are valid to evaluate EE. This EE indicator may be a useful tool during clinical practice. The cross-sectional design and the small sample size are limitations of the present study.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Aronoff E;Hillyer R;Leon M
通讯作者：
Leon M
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
Najar, Jenna;Ostling, Svante;Skoog, Ingmar
通讯作者：
Skoog, Ingmar
影响因子：
6.8
作者：
Jha S;Dong B;Sakata K
通讯作者：
Sakata K
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Grégoire CA;Bonenfant D;Le Nguyen A;Aumont A;Fernandes KJ
通讯作者：
Fernandes KJ
DOI：
10.4088/jcp.13086tx4c
发表时间：
2015-07-01
期刊：
The Journal of clinical psychiatry
影响因子：
--
作者：
Culpepper, Larry
通讯作者：
Culpepper, Larry