Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.
Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0018926
复制
发表时间：
2010-05
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Howard, Marc W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Onyper, Serge V.;Zhang, Yaofei X.;Howard, Marc W.
双加工理论假设再认记忆依赖于两个可区分的记忆信号。回忆反映了有意识地恢复有关学习片段的详细信息。熟悉度反映了一种记忆信号，这种信号并不伴随着生动的意识体验，但却使参与者能够区分最近经历过的探测项目和新项目。这种对再认记忆的双加工解释已经得到了认知神经科学家和一些认知心理学家的广泛认可。尽管如此，它的困难，在提供一个定量的满意的描述，在项目识别实验中的性能排除了共识，不仅是理论结构的识别记忆，而且如何最好地衡量识别精度。在两个实验中，我们表明，无论是双进程信号检测理论（DPSD）的标准制定，也不是一个广泛使用的单进程模型（UVSD）提供了一个令人满意的解释识别记忆不同类型的学习材料（单词和旅游场景）。在可变回忆双过程模型（VRDP）中，回忆失败的一些旧的探测项目，在双过程信号检测理论的标准配方，但产生了一个连续分布的记忆强度时，它成功。VRDP可以近似DPSD和UVSD。在这两个实验中，它提供了一个一致的上级适合跨材料的超集的DPSD和UVSD。VRDP提供了一个简单的解释形式的联合项目来源的判断，无论是DPSD或UVSD可以完成。VRDP的成功支持双过程理论的核心假设，通过提供跨材料，响应标准和响应类型的识别性能的出色的定量描述。
Dual-process theory hypothesizes that recognition memory depends on two distinguishable memory signals. Recollection reflects conscious recovery of detailed information about the learning episode. Familiarity reflects a memory signal that is not accompanied by a vivid conscious experience but nonetheless enables participants to distinguish recently-experienced probe items from novel ones. This dual-process explanation of recognition memory has gained wide acceptance among cognitive neuroscientists and some cognitive psychologists. Nonetheless, its difficulty in providing a quantitatively satisfactory description of performance in item recognition experiments has precluded a consensus not only about the theoretical structure of recognition memory but also about how to best measure recognition accuracy. In two experiments we show that neither the standard formulation of dual-process signal detection theory (DPSD) nor a widely-used single-process model (UVSD) provides a satisfactory explanation of recognition memory across different types of study materials (words and travel scenes). In the variable recollection dual-process model (VRDP), recollection fails for some old probe items, as in standard formulations of dual process signal detection theory, but gives rise to a continuous distribution of memory strengths when it succeeds. The VRDP can approximate both the DPSD and the UVSD. In both experiments it provides a consistently superior fit across materials to the superset of the DPSD and UVSD. The VRDP offers a simple explanation of the form of conjoint item-source judgments, something neither the DPSD nor the UVSD can accomplish. The success of the VRDP supports the core assumptions of dual-process theory by providing an excellent quantitative description of recognition performance across materials, response criteria and type of response.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Heathcote, Andrew;Raymond, Frances;Dunn, John
通讯作者：
Dunn, John
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Diana, RA;Reder, LM;Park, H
通讯作者：
Park, H
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
BATCHELDER, WH;RIEFER, DM
通讯作者：
RIEFER, DM
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.0705273104
发表时间：
2007-10-09
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Bowles, Ben;Crupi, Carina;Kohler, Stefan
通讯作者：
Kohler, Stefan
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
DeCarlo, LT
通讯作者：
DeCarlo, LT