The conduct and oppositional defiant disorder scales (CODDS) for disruptive behaviour disorders.

The conduct and oppositional defiant disorder scales (CODDS) for disruptive behaviour disorders.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114744
复制
发表时间:
2022-10
影响因子:
11.3
通讯作者:
Liu, Jianghong
Liu, Jianghong
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Raine, Adrian;Ling, Shichun;Streicher, Wesley;Liu, Jianghong

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

这项研究评估了一种五分钟的工具,即品行和对立违抗障碍量表(Codds),用于评估对立违抗障碍(ODD)和品行障碍(CD)的临床有效性。对428名11-12岁的儿童和他们的照顾者进行了NIMH DISC-IV(儿童诊断访谈计划)、Codds和效度测量。第二个样本(N=671)被用来建立基于DSM 5的有限亲社会情绪的简单测量。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线显示Codds量表在预测Disk-IV临床诊断的ODD(分别为85%,72%)和CD(85%,88%)方面具有良好的敏感性和特异性。在预测12个月后未来的椎间盘奇数和CD诊断,以及在预测社会和学校功能方面,基线Codds提供了超过基线临床椎间盘诊断的附加值。研究2进一步建立了Codds的心理测量学特性,Codds有限亲社会情绪(LPE)的简短测量与假设的LPE的DSM 5四因素结构很好地吻合。结果表明,在时间和资源有限的临床研究和潜在实践中,Codds作为诊断ODD和CD的五分钟替代指标具有实用价值。
This study evaluates the clinical validity of a five-minute instrument, the Conduct and Oppositional Defiant Disorder Scales (CODDS), for assessing oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD). Children (N = 428) aged 11–12 years and their caregiver were administered the NIMH DISC-IV (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children), the CODDS, and validity measures. A second sample (N = 671) was utilized to develop a brief measure of limited prosocial emotions based on DSM 5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves documented good sensitivity and specificity for CODDS scales in predicting DISC-IV clinical diagnoses of ODD (85%, 72% respectively) and CD (85%, 88%) diagnoses. Baseline CODDS provided added value over and above baseline clinical DISC- diagnoses in predicting future DISC ODD and CD diagnoses 12 months later, as well as in predicting social and school functioning. Study 2 further established psychometric properties of the CODDS, with brief measures of CODDS limited prosocial emotions (LPE) having a good fit to the hypothesized DSM 5 four-factor structure of LPE. Findings indicates that the CODDS has utility as a five-minute proxy for diagnoses of ODD and CD in clinical research and potentially practice where time and resources are limited.
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1394
发表时间: 2013-09
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Liu J;Richmond TS;Raine A;Cheney R;Brodkin ES;Gur RC;Gur RE
通讯作者: Gur RE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.006
发表时间: 2010-07-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Scarpa, Angela;Haden, Sara Chiara;Tanaka, Akiho
通讯作者: Tanaka, Akiho
DOI: 10.1177/1948550619875149
发表时间: 2020-05-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Chmielewski, Michael;Kucker, Sarah C.
通讯作者: Kucker, Sarah C.
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014
发表时间: 2000-01-01
影响因子: 13.3
作者:
Shaffer, D;Fisher, P;Schwab-Stone, ME
通讯作者: Schwab-Stone, ME
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.06.012
发表时间: 2014-10
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Beier, Anne Mette;Lauritzen, Lotte;Galfalvy, Hanga C.;Cooper, Thomas B.;Oquendo, Maria A.;Grunebaum, Michael F.;Mann, J. John;Sublette, M. Elizabeth
通讯作者: Sublette, M. Elizabeth