The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: Evidence for the Social Orientation Hypothesis.

The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: Evidence for the Social Orientation Hypothesis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0963721409359301
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Nisbett RE
Nisbett RE
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Varnum ME;Grossmann I;Kitayama S;Nisbett RE

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

大量研究记录了西方人和东亚人之间的认知差异。西方人往往更具分析性,而东亚人则更注重整体性。这些发现通常被解释为由于社会取向的相应差异所致。西方人更独立,东方人更相互依赖。然而,西方人和东亚人认知倾向的比较并不能让我们排除对认知差异的其他解释,例如语言和遗传差异,以及社会取向以外的文化差异。在这篇综述中,我们总结了最近的进展,为社会取向假说提供了更有力的支持。
A large body of research documents cognitive differences between Westerners and East Asians. Westerners tend to be more analytic and East Asians tend to be more holistic. These findings have often been explained as being due to corresponding differences in social orientation. Westerners are more independent and Easterners are more interdependent. However, comparisons of the cognitive tendencies of Westerners and East Asians do not allow us to rule out alternative explanations for the cognitive differences, such as linguistic and genetic differences, as well as cultural differences other than social orientation. In this review we summarize recent developments which provide stronger support for the social orientation hypothesis.
DOI: 10.1080/00207596608247156
发表时间: 1966-01-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
BERRY, JW
通讯作者: BERRY, JW
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803874105
发表时间: 2008-06-24
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Uskul, Ayse K.;Kitayama, Shinobu;Nisbett, Richard E.
通讯作者: Nisbett, Richard E.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.369
发表时间: 2006-09-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Kitayama, Shinobu;Ishii, K.;Ramaswamy, J.
通讯作者: Ramaswamy, J.
DOI: 10.1163/156853707x208512
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 0.4
作者:
Knight, Nicola;Nisbett, Richard E.
通讯作者: Nisbett, Richard E.
DOI: 10.1080/00207597108246686
发表时间: 1971-01-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
DERSHOWITZ, Z
通讯作者: DERSHOWITZ, Z