A Comparative Analysis of Information Gathering Meetings Conducted by Novice Design Teams Across Multiple Design Project Stages
A Comparative Analysis of Information Gathering Meetings Conducted by Novice Design Teams Across Multiple Design Project Stages
复制标题
新手设计团队在多个设计项目阶段举行的信息收集会议的比较分析
DOI：
10.1115/1.4049970
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Sienko, Kathleen H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Loweth, Robert P.;Daly, Shanna R.;Hortop, Amy;Strehl, Elizabeth A.;Sienko, Kathleen H.
设计师经常收集信息，例如通过利益相关者或领域专家会议，以了解他们的设计问题并制定有效的解决方案。然而，很少有以前的研究提供了深入的描述新手工程设计师的方法进行信息收集会议。在这项初步研究中，我们分析了来自六个顶点机械工程设计团队的数据，以确定团队收集信息的个人类型，这些会议何时发生，以及团队如何在会议期间征求信息。在我们的研究中，团队展示了一系列与推荐实践相一致的信息收集行为，特别是在他们的早期会议中。我们还观察到相对较少的团队在会议期间表现出与推荐实践不太相似的行为。然而，我们的研究结果揭示了两个关键的趋势，代表了具体的改进机会，并可能反映了特征的新手方法进行信息收集会议。首先，团队在会议期间深入探讨领域专家的观点，并与其他领域专家会面，以告知他们的项目。相比之下，团队与项目合作伙伴的会议很少包含深度探索性信息收集行为的实例。此外，团队似乎在早期的设计会议中完成设计决策，并且不太可能在后期的设计阶段进行信息收集会议。在我们的初步研究中提供的新手机械工程设计师的方法的全面描述提供了进一步调查的切入点，可以通知工程培训，工具和教学进行有效的会议。
Designers often gather information, for instance through stakeholder or domain expert meetings, to understand their design problems and develop effective solutions. However, few previous studies have provided in-depth descriptions of novice engineering designers’ approaches to conducting information gathering meetings. In this preliminary study, we analyzed data from six capstone mechanical engineering design teams to identify the types of individuals from whom teams gathered information, when these meetings occurred, and how teams solicited information during meetings. Teams in our study exhibited a range of information gathering behaviors that aligned with recommended practices, particularly in their early meetings. We also observed relatively few instances of teams exhibiting behaviors that were less similar to recommended practices during their meetings. However, our findings revealed two key trends across teams that represented specific opportunities for improvement and that may reflect characteristic novice approaches to conducting information gathering meetings. First, teams explored domain experts’ perspectives in depth during meetings and met with additional domain experts to inform their projects. Teams' meetings with project partners contained few instances of deep exploratory information gathering behaviors in comparison. In addition, teams seemed to finalize design decisions during early design meetings and were less likely to conduct information gathering meetings during later design phases. The comprehensive descriptions of novice mechanical engineering designers’ approaches provided in our preliminary study provide an entry point for further investigations that can inform engineering training, tools, and pedagogy for conducting effective meetings.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hallgren KA
通讯作者：
Hallgren KA
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
I. Mohedas;S. Daly;K. Sienko
通讯作者：
K. Sienko
检查情景设计实践：护士向真正参与的转变
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
K. Østergaard;Jesper Simonsen;H. Karasti
通讯作者：
H. Karasti
被动、协商和共建方法：促进社区参与开发设计的框架
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Andrea Mazzurco;J. Leydens;B. Jesiek
通讯作者：
B. Jesiek
人机交互的批判种族理论
DOI：
10.1145/3313831.3376392
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya;Angela D. R. Smith;Alexandra To;K. Toyama
通讯作者：
K. Toyama