Family size evolution in Drosophila chemosensory gene families: a comparative analysis with a critical appraisal of methods.
Family size evolution in Drosophila chemosensory gene families: a comparative analysis with a critical appraisal of methods.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/gbe/evu130
复制
发表时间:
2014-06-19
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Rozas J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Almeida FC;Sánchez-Gracia A;Campos JL;Rozas J
Gene turnover rates and the evolution of gene family sizes are important aspects of genome evolution. Here, we use curated sequence data of the major chemosensory gene families from Drosophila—the gustatory receptor, odorant receptor, ionotropic receptor, and odorant-binding protein families—to conduct a comparative analysis among families, exploring different methods to estimate gene birth and death rates, including an ad hoc simulation study. Remarkably, we found that the state-of-the-art methods may produce very different rate estimates, which may lead to disparate conclusions regarding the evolution of chemosensory gene family sizes in Drosophila. Among biological factors, we found that a peculiarity of D. sechellia’s gene turnover rates was a major source of bias in global estimates, whereas gene conversion had negligible effects for the families analyzed herein. Turnover rates vary considerably among families, subfamilies, and ortholog groups although all analyzed families were quite dynamic in terms of gene turnover. Computer simulations showed that the methods that use ortholog group information appear to be the most accurate for the Drosophila chemosensory families. Most importantly, these results reveal the potential of rate heterogeneity among lineages to severely bias some turnover rate estimation methods and the need of further evaluating the performance of these methods in a more diverse sampling of gene families and phylogenetic contexts. Using branch-specific codon substitution models, we find further evidence of positive selection in recently duplicated genes, which attests to a nonneutral aspect of the gene birth-and-death process.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Clark, Andrew G.;Eisen, Michael B.;MacCallum, Iain
通讯作者:
MacCallum, Iain
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Hahn MW;Han MV;Han SG
通讯作者:
Han SG
影响因子:
12.3
作者:
Gabaldón T
通讯作者:
Gabaldón T
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Engsontia, Patamarerk;Sanderson, Alan P.;Brown, Stephen
通讯作者:
Brown, Stephen
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0608424104
发表时间:
2007-03-20
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
McBride, Carolyn S.
通讯作者:
McBride, Carolyn S.