Extending the Balloon Analogue Risk Task to Assess Naturalistic Risk Taking via a Mobile Platform.
Extending the Balloon Analogue Risk Task to Assess Naturalistic Risk Taking via a Mobile Platform.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10862-017-9628-4
复制
发表时间：
2018-03
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Wilson SJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MacLean RR;Pincus AL;Smyth JM;Geier CF;Wilson SJ
气球模拟风险任务(BART)是一种通常用于评估冒险倾向的行为测量工具。本研究的主要目的是介绍BART的移动版本(MBART)，该版本可以包括在动态评估方案中，以评估日常生活中的风险承担。研究1比较了一次在计算机上使用实验室BART和在智能手机上使用mBART时常见的BART指数(即赚的钱总额、调整后的平均泵数、气球爆炸和变异系数[CV])(n=78)。结果显示，在实验室BART和mBART中，冒险倾向指数之间的关系基本一致。研究2在非每日吸烟者(n=51)人群中实施mBART，作为7天生态瞬时评估(EMA)方案的一部分。使用多水平模型，结果表明，男性有更大的调整后的平均泵(p=.03)，参与者的平均CV与特质感觉寻求呈负相关(p=.03)，与特质积极紧迫感呈正相关(p=.04)。研究日(p=.05)和环境(p=.02)对调整后的平均泵有个人影响，因此，随着研究的进行，个人承担更大的风险，与其他人相比，独自一人的风险更大。将mBART纳入EMA似乎没有显著增加参与者的负担，并显示出可接受的遵从性水平。这些结果为mBART在门诊研究设计中的可行性和实用性提供了初步证据。
The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) is a behavioral measure that is commonly used to assess risk taking propensity. The primary goal of the present study was to introduce a mobile version of the BART (mBART) that can be included within ambulatory assessment protocols to assess risk taking in daily life. Study 1 compared common BART indices (i.e., total money earned, adjusted average pumps, balloon explosions, and coefficient of variability [CV]) on a single administration of the laboratory BART on a computer and the mBART on a smartphone (n = 78). Results revealed generally consistent relationships between indices of risk taking propensity in both the laboratory BART and mBART. Study 2 administered the mBART as part of a 7-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol in a population of nondaily smokers (n = 51). Using multi-level models, results suggest that males have greater adjusted average pumps (p = .03), and that a participant’s average CV is negatively related to trait sensation seeking (p = .03) and positively associated with trait positive urgency (p = .04). There were within-person effects of study day (p = .05) and environment (p = .02) with respect to adjusted average pumps such that individuals took greater risks as the study progressed and were riskier when alone compared to with others. Inclusion of the mBART in EMA did not appear to significantly increase participant burden and demonstrated acceptable levels of compliance. These results offer initial evidence supporting the feasibility and utility of the mBART for ambulatory research designs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Fernie, Gordon;Cole, Jon C.;Field, Matt
通讯作者：
Field, Matt
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Bornovalova, Marina A.;Gwadz, Marya A.;Lejuez, C. W.
通讯作者：
Lejuez, C. W.
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Ashenhurst, James R.;Bujarski, Spencer;Ray, Lara A.
通讯作者：
Ray, Lara A.
DOI：
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02434.x
发表时间：
2009-02
期刊：
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Cyders MA;Flory K;Rainer S;Smith GT
通讯作者：
Smith GT
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Cyders, Melissa A.;Smith, Gregory T.
通讯作者：
Smith, Gregory T.