Diplomatic Deliberative Practices in International Organizations: Does Institutional Design Matter?
Diplomatic Deliberative Practices in International Organizations: Does Institutional Design Matter?
复制标题
国际组织中的外交协商实践:制度设计重要吗?
DOI:
10.1080/09592296.2022.2143126
复制
发表时间:
--
影响因子:
0.4
通讯作者:
Franziska Hohlstein
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Diana Panke;Gurur Polat;Franziska Hohlstein
Scholars have demonstrated that deliberation between political actors in states as well as in International Organizations (IOs) matters because it can impact the quality and legitimacy of outcomes. Yet, we do not know much about how deliberation between political actors can be triggered in practice. Drawing on insights from the deliberative turn that has taken place in Comparative Politics as well as insights from International Relations, this paper inquires how different IO institutional features effect the extent of diplomatic deliberation. Unique and novel survey data shows that there is variation between and within IOs. In some IOs, such as the UNFCCC or CoE, diplomats engage in extensive deliberations, while they do so considerably less in others, such as the UNWTO or IWC. Our paper provides novel insights into the inner working of IOs. In general, diplomatic debates are most pronounced in large IOs with high level delegates that often opt for negotiating behind closed doors. In addition, specific institutional design elements matter in the different stages of an IO policy-cycle, such as procedural rules fostering interaction between diplomats in the negotiation stage or a limited policy scope in the voting stage.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
D. Panke
通讯作者:
D. Panke
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Yoram Z. Haftel
通讯作者:
Yoram Z. Haftel
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
B. Netelenbos
通讯作者:
B. Netelenbos
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
D. Panke
通讯作者:
D. Panke
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
M. Zürn
通讯作者:
M. Zürn