Informed, involved, or empowered? Three ideal types of autism policy design in Western Europe
Informed, involved, or empowered? Three ideal types of autism policy design in Western Europe
复制标题
知情、参与或授权？
DOI：
10.1002/epa2.1092
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Precious K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Precious K
制定政策赋予边缘化群体权力的政府有助于减少公共政策中的民主赤字，并提高其效力、效率和民主资格。本文根据政府认为目标群体只能接受专家的告知，还是只能参与政策，甚至有权共同治理，运用模糊集理想类型分析，提出了三种理想的政治赋权政策设计类型。对西欧自闭症政策的分析说明并证实了理想类型的有用性。英格兰、威尔士和丹麦成为政府对政治赋权抱有最高期望的国家。令人惊讶的是，传统的残疾人政策分组似乎并不适用，英国分为赋权型和参与型，而西班牙则离开了知情的南欧同行，加入了参与型群体。本文及时提醒人们生活经验作为政策资源的重要性。生活经验作为政策资源。
Governments which design policies to empower marginalized groups contribute to reducing the democratic deficit in public policy and improve their efficacy, efficiency, and democratic credentials. This article uses fuzzy set ideal type analysis to propose three ideal types of policy design for political empowerment, according to whether the government views the target group as capable only of being Informed by experts, or of being Involved in policy, or even Empowered to co‐govern. An analysis of Western European autism policy illustrates and confirms the usefulness of the ideal types. England, Wales, and Denmark emerge as countries where governments have the highest expectations for political empowerment. Surprisingly, traditional disability policy groupings seem not to apply, with the UK split across Empowered and Involved, while Spain leaves its Informed Southern European counterparts to join the Involved cohort. This paper is a timely reminder of the importance of lived experience as a policy resource lived experience as a policy resource.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
N. Urbinati
通讯作者：
N. Urbinati
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Fulcher
通讯作者：
G. Fulcher
有些人比其他人更平等：欧洲社会政策和歧视法中残疾的定义
影响因子：
2
作者：
D. Mabbett
通讯作者：
D. Mabbett
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
W. Sullivan
通讯作者：
W. Sullivan
游说影响力：意义、衡量和缺失
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
D. Lowery
通讯作者：
D. Lowery