Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields.

Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/10731911211067538
复制
发表时间:
2023-04
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Neubauer, Andreas B.
Neubauer, Andreas B.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wrzus, Cornelia;Neubauer, Andreas B.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

生态瞬时评估(EMA,日常生活中的重复评估)广泛存在于心理学及相关学科的许多领域。然而,关于研究设计和样本的差异如何预测研究依从性和辍学--(微观)纵向研究中数据质量的两个核心参数--的知识很少。目前的Meta分析包括k=477篇文章(496个样本,总N=677,536)。对于每一篇文章,我们对设计、样本特征、合规性和辍学率进行了编码。结果显示,EMA研究平均每天安排6次评估,持续7天,获得79%的遵从性。每天评估越多的研究计划的评估天数越少,然而,评估的数量并不能预测遵从性或辍学率。在提供经济激励的研究中,遵从性明显更高。否则,设计或样品特性几乎没有影响。我们讨论了这些发现对EMA研究的规划、报告和审查的影响。
Ecological Momentary Assessments (i.e., EMA, repeated assessments in daily life) are widespread in many fields of psychology and related disciplines. Yet, little knowledge exists on how differences in study designs and samples predict study compliance and dropout—two central parameters of data quality in (micro-)longitudinal research. The current meta-analysis included k = 477 articles (496 samples, total N = 677,536). For each article, we coded the design, sample characteristics, compliance, and dropout rate. The results showed that on average EMA studies scheduled six assessments per day, lasted for 7 days, and obtained a compliance of 79%. Studies with more assessments per day scheduled fewer assessment days, yet, the number of assessments did not predict compliance or dropout rates. Compliance was significantly higher in studies providing financial incentives. Otherwise, design or sample characteristics had little effects. We discuss the implications of the findings for planning, reporting, and reviewing EMA studies.
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.048
发表时间: 2014-04-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Doherty, Sean T.;Lemieux, Christopher J.;Canally, Culum
通讯作者: Canally, Culum
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5447-0
发表时间: 2018-05-02
期刊: BMC public health
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Ashurst J;van Woerden I;Dunton G;Todd M;Ohri-Vachaspati P;Swan P;Bruening M
通讯作者: Bruening M
DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000289
发表时间: 2021-03
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Lucas RE;Wallsworth C;Anusic I;Donnellan MB
通讯作者: Donnellan MB
DOI: 10.1177/1073191116632341
发表时间: 2016-08
期刊: Assessment
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Carpenter RW;Wycoff AM;Trull TJ
通讯作者: Trull TJ
使用智能手机收集心理科学中的行为数据:机遇,实际考虑和挑战。
DOI: 10.1177/1745691616650285
发表时间: 2016-11
期刊: Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
影响因子: --
作者:
Harari GM;Lane ND;Wang R;Crosier BS;Campbell AT;Gosling SD
通讯作者: Gosling SD