A direct comparison of the day reconstruction method (DRM) and the experience sampling method (ESM).
A direct comparison of the day reconstruction method (DRM) and the experience sampling method (ESM).
复制标题
白昼重建法（DRM）与经验抽样法（ESM）的直接比较。
DOI：
10.1037/pspp0000289
复制
发表时间：
2021-03
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Donnellan MB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lucas RE;Wallsworth C;Anusic I;Donnellan MB
日重建法（DRM）是一种测量幸福感的方法，旨在近似从经验抽样法（ESM）中使用的密集重复测量设计中获得的丰富数据。虽然已经对DRM的有效性进行了一些初步测试，但这些测试通常集中在两种方法在非常广泛的层面上的一致性，而不是集中在两种方法是否提供了关于完全相同时刻的相似信息。本文报告了两项研究，使用ESM和DRM来评估相同的时刻。这两项措施之间的协议有很大差异，取决于分析的重点。对于总时间花费的情况和平均影响的情况下，协议的总评估是高的;人与人之间的时间使用和经验的影响，协议不同的情况下，和人内的差异，在这两种情况和影响，协议是相当低的。此外，我们发现的初步证据表明，DRM可能会受到更多的影响，预期的愉快的情况相比，ESM。这些结果表明，对于许多常见的目的，DRM不提供与ESM相同的信息。
The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) is an approach to measuring well-being that is designed to approximate the rich data that can be obtained from intensive repeated measures designs like those used in the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). Although some preliminary tests of the validity of the DRM have been conducted, these typically focus on agreement between the two methods at very broad levels, rather than focusing on whether the two methods provide similar information about the exact same moments. This paper reports two studies that use ESM and DRM to assess the same moments. Agreement between the two measures varied considerably depending on the focus of the analysis. For aggregate assessments of total time spent in situations and average affect in situations, agreement was high; for between-person differences in time use and experienced affect, agreement varied across situations; and for within-person differences in both situations and affect, agreement was quite low. In addition, we found preliminary evidence that the DRM may be more influenced by expectations regarding the pleasantness of situations as compared to ESM. These results suggest that for many common purposes, the DRM does not provide the same information as ESM.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Daly, Michael;Delaney, Liam;MacLachlan, Malcolm
通讯作者：
MacLachlan, Malcolm
影响因子：
5.1
作者：
Oerlemans, Wido G. M.;Bakker, Arnold B.
通讯作者：
Bakker, Arnold B.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Dockray S;Grant N;Stone AA;Kahneman D;Wardle J;Steptoe A
通讯作者：
Steptoe A
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Lucas, Richard E.;Freedman, Vicki A.;Carr, Deborah
通讯作者：
Carr, Deborah
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Hudson NW;Anusic I;Lucas RE;Donnellan MB
通讯作者：
Donnellan MB