Propositional apriority and the nesting problem

Propositional apriority and the nesting problem
复制标题

命题优先性和嵌套问题

DOI:
10.1007/s11098-016-0728-x
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
Kipper
Kipper
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kipper

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

根据命题先验性的模态说明,一个命题是先验的,如果有可能知道它与先验的理由。假设模态真理必然为真,并且存在偶然的先验真理,这种解释有一个不希望的结果,即一个命题在它为假的世界中可以是先验的。认识二维论也面临同样的问题,因为根据它的标准解释,它也意味着先验命题必然是先验的。针对这一问题,查尔默斯和拉伯恩提出了命题先验性的另一种概念以及先验性陈述的二维真值条件。他们的建议也被认为是为了避免模态解释的另一个问题,即它必然存在“φ当且仅当”的错误实例。我讨论了查尔默斯和拉伯恩的解释,指出了其中的一些问题,然后发展了我自己的关于命题先验性的解释,它解决了所讨论的问题,它可以被二维主义的朋友和敌人所接受,而且对于如何定义命题先验性的对象的问题,它也是中立的。
According to the modal account of propositional apriority, a proposition is a priori if it is possible to know it with a priori justification. Assuming that modal truths are necessarily true and that there are contingent a priori truths, this account has the undesirable consequence that a proposition can be a priori in a world in which it is false. Epistemic two-dimensionalism faces the same problem, since on its standard interpretation, it also entails that a priori propositions are necessarily a priori. In response to this problem, Chalmers and Rabern propose an alternative conception of propositional apriority as well as two-dimensional truth-conditions for apriority statements. Their proposal is also supposed to avoid another problem for the modal account, namely that it entails the existence of false instances of ‘φ iff actually φ’. I discuss Chalmers and Rabern’s account and point out a number of problems with it. I then develop my own account of propositional apriority that solves the problems in question, that can be accepted by friends and foes of two-dimensionalism alike, and that is also neutral with respect to the question of how one construes the objects of propositional apriority.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Chalmers
通讯作者: D. Chalmers
非因果倾向: 非因果倾向
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Daniel Nolan
通讯作者: Daniel Nolan
弗雷格之谜和可信对象
DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzr046
发表时间: 2011
期刊: Mind
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
D. Chalmers
通讯作者: D. Chalmers
普兰丁加和偶然的可能性
DOI: 10.1093/analys/36.2.106
发表时间: 1976
期刊: Analysis
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Hugh S. Chandler
通讯作者: Hugh S. Chandler
现实性和可知性
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Chalmers
通讯作者: D. Chalmers