Myelin Measurement: Comparison Between Simultaneous Tissue Relaxometry, Magnetization Transfer Saturation Index, and T(1)w/T(2)w Ratio Methods.
Myelin Measurement: Comparison Between Simultaneous Tissue Relaxometry, Magnetization Transfer Saturation Index, and T(1)w/T(2)w Ratio Methods.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-018-28852-6
复制
发表时间:
2018-07-12
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Aoki S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hagiwara A;Hori M;Kamagata K;Warntjes M;Matsuyoshi D;Nakazawa M;Ueda R;Andica C;Koshino S;Maekawa T;Irie R;Takamura T;Kumamaru KK;Abe O;Aoki S
Magnetization transfer (MT) imaging has been widely used for estimating myelin content in the brain. Recently, two other approaches, namely simultaneous tissue relaxometry of R1 and R2 relaxation rates and proton density (SyMRI) and the ratio of T1-weighted to T2-weighted images (T1w/T2w ratio), were also proposed as methods for measuring myelin. SyMRI and MT imaging have been reported to correlate well with actual myelin by histology. However, for T1w/T2w ratio, such evidence is limited. In 20 healthy adults, we examined the correlation between these three methods, using MT saturation index (MTsat) for MT imaging. After calibration, white matter (WM) to gray matter (GM) contrast was the highest for SyMRI among these three metrics. Even though SyMRI and MTsat showed strong correlation in the WM (r = 0.72), only weak correlation was found between T1w/T2w and SyMRI (r = 0.45) or MTsat (r = 0.38) (correlation coefficients significantly different from each other, with p values < 0.001). In subcortical and cortical GM, these measurements showed moderate to strong correlations to each other (r = 0.54 to 0.78). In conclusion, the high correlation between SyMRI and MTsat indicates that both methods are similarly suited to measure myelin in the WM, whereas T1w/T2w ratio may be less optimal.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1523/jneurosci.2180-11.2011
发表时间:
2011-08-10
期刊:
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子:
--
作者:
Glasser MF;Van Essen DC
通讯作者:
Van Essen DC
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
FILIPPI, M;CAMPI, A;COMI, G
通讯作者:
COMI, G
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Cercignani M;Giulietti G;Dowell NG;Gabel M;Broad R;Leigh PN;Harrison NA;Bozzali M
通讯作者:
Bozzali M
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Dula, Adrienne N.;Gochberg, Daniel F.;Valentine, Holly L.;Valentine, William M.;Does, Mark D.
通讯作者:
Does, Mark D.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Hagiwara, A.;Hori, M.;Aoki, S.
通讯作者:
Aoki, S.