Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2196/34894
复制
发表时间：
2022-03-02
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Landis-Lewis Z
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Helminski D;Kurlander JE;Renji AD;Sussman JB;Pfeiffer PN;Conte ML;Gadabu OJ;Kokaly AN;Goldberg R;Ranusch A;Damschroder LJ;Landis-Lewis Z
医疗保健组织越来越依赖商业智能工具(包括“仪表板”)来捕获、分析和呈现有关性能指标的数据。理想情况下，仪表板允许用户快速可视化可操作的数据，以告知和优化临床和组织绩效。实际上，仪表板通常嵌入在拥有海量数据流的复杂医疗保健组织和具有不同需求的终端用户中。因此，设计有效的仪表板是一项具有挑战性的任务，医疗保健仪表板的理论基础没有得到很好的描述；甚至仪表板的概念仍然定义不清。研究人员、信息学家、临床经理和医疗保健管理员将受益于更清楚地了解仪表板是如何开发、实施和评估的，以及设计、最终用户和环境如何影响它们的使用和有效性。本范围回顾首先旨在调查大量已发表的“仪表板”文献，以描述在医疗保健环境中使用它们的位置、原因和对象，以及它们是如何开发、实施和评估的。此外，我们将研究仪表板设计和内容是如何由预期目的和最终用户提供信息的。2020年7月，我们使用与研究图书馆员共同开发的有针对性的策略，在MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆中搜索同行评议文献，检索了5188个结果。在重复数据消除之后，对3306项研究进行了标题和摘要的复印件筛选。任何提到医疗保健仪表板的摘要都被全文检索，并正在接受资格的重复审查。如果文章描述了在日常工作流程中成功使用的仪表板的开发、实现或评估，则将包括用于数据提取和分析的文章。如果文章是在2015年前发表的，全文不可用，使用非英语语言，或者描述用于公共卫生跟踪的仪表盘，在没有提供直接患者护理的环境中，或者在本科医学教育中，这些文章将被排除在外。资格认定中的任何不一致之处将由第三方审查员裁决。我们选择重点关注2015年后发表的文章以及那些描述仪表板在日常实践中成功使用的文章，以确定支持快速发展的医疗保健信息学领域未来仪表板发展的最新和相关文献。所有文章都经过了标题和摘要的双重审查，共有2019篇文章提到使用全文检索的医疗保健仪表板供进一步审查。我们目前正在审阅所有全文文章一式两份。我们的目标是在2022年年中公布调查结果。调查结果将根据PRISMA-SCR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的Meta分析扩展)核对表的指导进行报告。该范围审查将为利益攸关方提供现有仪表板工具的概述，重点介绍在不同环境和不同最终用户群体中开发、实施和评估仪表板的方式，并找出潜在的研究差距。研究结果将指导医疗保健部门更有效地设计和使用仪表板的努力。DERR1-10.2196/34894
Health care organizations increasingly depend on business intelligence tools, including “dashboards,” to capture, analyze, and present data on performance metrics. Ideally, dashboards allow users to quickly visualize actionable data to inform and optimize clinical and organizational performance. In reality, dashboards are typically embedded in complex health care organizations with massive data streams and end users with distinct needs. Thus, designing effective dashboards is a challenging task and theoretical underpinnings of health care dashboards are poorly characterized; even the concept of the dashboard remains ill-defined. Researchers, informaticists, clinical managers, and health care administrators will benefit from a clearer understanding of how dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated, and how the design, end user, and context influence their uptake and effectiveness. This scoping review first aims to survey the vast published literature of “dashboards” to describe where, why, and for whom they are used in health care settings, as well as how they are developed, implemented, and evaluated. Further, we will examine how dashboard design and content is informed by intended purpose and end users. In July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed literature using a targeted strategy developed with a research librarian and retrieved 5188 results. Following deduplication, 3306 studies were screened in duplicate for title and abstract. Any abstracts mentioning a health care dashboard were retrieved in full text and are undergoing duplicate review for eligibility. Articles will be included for data extraction and analysis if they describe the development, implementation, or evaluation of a dashboard that was successfully used in routine workflow. Articles will be excluded if they were published before 2015, the full text is unavailable, they are in a non-English language, or they describe dashboards used for public health tracking, in settings where direct patient care is not provided, or in undergraduate medical education. Any discrepancies in eligibility determination will be adjudicated by a third reviewer. We chose to focus on articles published after 2015 and those that describe dashboards that were successfully used in routine practice to identify the most recent and relevant literature to support future dashboard development in the rapidly evolving field of health care informatics. All articles have undergone dual review for title and abstract, with a total of 2019 articles mentioning use of a health care dashboard retrieved in full text for further review. We are currently reviewing all full-text articles in duplicate. We aim to publish findings by mid-2022. Findings will be reported following guidance from the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. This scoping review will provide stakeholders with an overview of existing dashboard tools, highlighting the ways in which dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated in different settings and for different end user groups, and identify potential research gaps. Findings will guide efforts to design and use dashboards in the health care sector more effectively. DERR1-10.2196/34894
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0
发表时间：
2015-08-07
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Waltz TJ;Powell BJ;Matthieu MM;Damschroder LJ;Chinman MJ;Smith JL;Proctor EK;Kirchner JE
通讯作者：
Kirchner JE
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Mould, Diane R.;Upton, Richard N.;Dubinsky, Marla C.
通讯作者：
Dubinsky, Marla C.
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
发表时间：
2010-09-20
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Levac D;Colquhoun H;O'Brien KK
通讯作者：
O'Brien KK
影响因子：
39.2
作者：
Tricco, Andrea C.;Lillie, Erin;Straus, Sharon E.
通讯作者：
Straus, Sharon E.
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Buttigieg, Sandra C.;Pace, Adriana;Rathert, Cheryl
通讯作者：
Rathert, Cheryl