Do different salience cues compete for dominance in memory over a daytime nap?
Do different salience cues compete for dominance in memory over a daytime nap?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.nlm.2018.06.005
复制
发表时间:
2019-04
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Payne JD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alger SE;Chen S;Payne JD
Information that is the most salient and important for future use is preferentially preserved through active processing during sleep. Emotional salience is a biologically adaptive cue that influences episodic memory processing through interactions between amygdalar and hippocampal activity. However, other cues that influence the importance of information, such as the explicit direction to remember or forget, interact with the inherent salience of information to determine its fate in memory. It is unknown how sleep-based processes selectively consolidate this complex information. The current study examined the development of memory for emotional and neutral information that was either cued to-be-remembered (TBR) or to-be-forgotten (TBF) across a daytime period including either napping or wakefulness. Baseline memory revealed dominance of the TBR cue, regardless of emotional salience. As anticipated, napping was found to preserve memory overall significantly better than remaining awake. Furthermore, we observed a trending interaction indicating that napping specifically enhanced the discrimination between the most salient information (negative TBR items) over other information. We found that memory for negative items was positively associated with the percentage of SWS obtained during a nap. Furthermore, the magnitude of the difference in memory between negative TBR items and negative TBF items increased with greater sleep spindle activity. Taken together, our results suggest that although the cue to actively remember or intentionally forget initially wins out, active processes during sleep facilitate the competition between salience cues to promote the most salient information in memory.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Eschenko, Oxana;Sara, Susan J.
通讯作者:
Sara, Susan J.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Groch, Sabine;Wilhelm, Ines;Born, Jan
通讯作者:
Born, Jan
影响因子:
19.9
作者:
Anderson, Michael C.;Hanslmayr, Simon
通讯作者:
Hanslmayr, Simon
DOI:
10.1177/1754073908100436
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kensinger EA
通讯作者:
Kensinger EA
DOI:
10.3758/bf03200977
发表时间:
1985-12-01
期刊:
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS
影响因子:
--
作者:
DINGES, DF;POWELL, JW
通讯作者:
POWELL, JW