Autonomic conditioning to monetary and social stimuli and aggression in children.
Autonomic conditioning to monetary and social stimuli and aggression in children.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ab.21738
复制
发表时间：
2018-03
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Wang MC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gao Y;Mendez K;Li X;Wang MC
对惩罚的不良条件反射，如大声的音调或电击，已被认为是攻击性和精神病行为的病因学中的一个重要因素。然而，目前尚不清楚当货币或社会刺激被用作无条件刺激时，这种关联是否成立，以及攻击性个体是否对奖励也有条件反射。在这项研究中，皮肤电导反应的条件反射任务，包括金钱/社会奖励和惩罚作为非条件刺激进行了评估，在340名男性和女性的8至9岁的儿童从社区。儿童使用反应性和主动性攻击问卷（RPQ）报告他们的反应性和主动性攻击。结果表明，金钱/社会奖励和惩罚可以有效地激发儿童的生理经典条件反射，而奖励条件反射的减少尤其与高水平的主动攻击性有关。研究结果强调了在检查儿童反社会行为时区分反应性和主动性攻击的重要性，并表明奖励导向的治疗方案可能对具有更积极主动的工具性攻击行为的儿童无效。
Poor conditioning to punishment, such as loud tones or electric shock, has been proposed as an important factor involved in the etiology of aggressive and psychopathic behavior. However, it is not known whether the association holds when monetary or social stimulus is used as the unconditioned stimulus, and if aggressive individuals also have impaired conditioning to rewards. In this study, skin conductance responses in a conditioning task involving both monetary/social reward and punishment as unconditioned stimuli were assessed in 340 male and female 8-to 9-year-old children from the community. Children reported their reactive and proactive aggression using the Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ). Results showed that monetary/social reward and punishment were effective in eliciting physiological classical conditioning in children, and that reduced reward conditioning was associated with high levels of proactive aggression in particular. Findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between reactive and proactive aggression when examining antisocial behavior in children, and suggest that reward-oriented treatment programs may not be effective for children with more proactive, instrumental aggressive behavior.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Baskin-Sommers AR;Curtin JJ;Newman JP
通讯作者：
Newman JP
影响因子：
56.9
作者：
BECHARA, A;TRANEL, D;DAMASIO, AR
通讯作者：
DAMASIO, AR
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Delgado, M. R.;Labouliere, C. D.;Phelps, E. A.
通讯作者：
Phelps, E. A.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Babcock, Julia C.;Tharp, Andra L. T.;Stanford, Matthew S.
通讯作者：
Stanford, Matthew S.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Hartung, CM;Milich, G;Martin, CA
通讯作者：
Martin, CA