Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research.

Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1353/cpr.2012.0048
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
DiGirolamo A
DiGirolamo A
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hacker K;Tendulkar SA;Rideout C;Bhuiya N;Trinh-Shevrin C;Savage CP;Grullon M;Strelnick H;Leung C;DiGirolamo A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对社区而言,以社区为基础的参与性研究的价值往往体现在提高能力和可持续地采用循证做法促进社会变革的成果上。促进社区和学术伙伴之间的讨论的教育机会有助于推进CBPR并更好地定义这些成果。本文描述了一次社区学术会议,以制定与CBPR相关的社区能力建设和可持续性的共同定义,并确定两者的障碍和促进者。“把它带到路边:让社区参与为健康创造可持续的变化”是由五个临床翻译科学研究所和四个社区组织计划的。在主旨发言后,社区和学术成员分组开会,确定社区能力建设和可持续性,并确定实现这两个目标的促进者和障碍。小组由研究人员-社区合作伙伴团队提供便利,对话被录音和转录。专题内容的定性分析由规划委员会的一部分进行。重要的调查结果包括了解到:(1)能力和可持续性的概念被认为是相互关联的;(2)伙伴关系被视为CBPR的促进者和成果;(3)可持续性与社区内一代人向另一代人的“知识转移”挂钩;(4)当分享目标和实现健康成果时,能力和可持续性会得到加强。社区能力建设和可持续性是社区CBPR的关键成果。让社区成员和学者参与并相互教育的共同学习机会可以是确定实现这些成果的有意义战略的有用战略。
For communities, the value of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is often manifested in the outcomes of increased capacity and sustainable adoption of evidence-based practices for social change. Educational opportunities that promote discourse between community and academic partners can help to advance CBPR and better define these outcomes. This paper describes a community–academic conference to develop shared definitions of community capacity building and sustainability related to CBPR and to identify obstacles and facilitators to both. “Taking It to the Curbside: Engaging Communities to Create Sustainable Change for Health” was planned by five Clinical Translational Science Institutes and four community organizations. After a keynote presentation, breakout groups of community and academic members met to define community capacity building and sustainability, and to identify facilitators and barriers to achieving both. Groups were facilitated by researcher–community partner teams and conversations were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis for thematic content was conducted by a subset of the planning committee. Important findings included learning that (1) the concepts of capacity and sustainability were considered interconnected; (2) partnership was perceived as both a facilitator and an outcome of CBPR; (3) sustainability was linked to “transfer of knowledge” from one generation to another within a community; and (4) capacity and sustainability were enhanced when goals were shared and health outcomes were achieved. Community capacity building and sustainability are key outcomes of CBPR for communities. Co-learning opportunities that engage and mutually educate both community members and academics can be useful strategies for identifying meaningful strategies to achieve these outcomes.
基于社区的参与性研究从边缘走向主流:研究人员准备好了吗?
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.729863
发表时间: 2009-05-19
期刊: CIRCULATION
影响因子: 37.8
作者:
Horowitz, Carol R.;Robinson, Mimsie;Seifer, Sarena
通讯作者: Seifer, Sarena
DOI: 10.1177/1077558703259069
发表时间: 2003-12-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Alexander, JA;Weiner, BJ;Conrad, DA
通讯作者: Conrad, DA
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-003-0046-5
发表时间: 2003-10-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Brugge, D;Kole, A
通讯作者: Kole, A
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00067-8
发表时间: 2000-09-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Hawe, P;Shiell, A
通讯作者: Shiell, A
DOI: 10.2307/2393532
发表时间: 1992-03-01
影响因子: 10.4
作者:
FRIEDMAN, RA;PODOLNY, J
通讯作者: PODOLNY, J