Cognitive processes in children's dietary recalls: insight from methodological studies.
Cognitive processes in children's dietary recalls: insight from methodological studies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1038/ejcn.2008.61
复制
发表时间：
2009-02
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
This article summarises 12 dietary-reporting methodological studies with children (six validation studies, one non-validation study, five secondary analyses studies of data from one or more of the six validation studies), identifies research gaps, and provides recommendations for (a) improving children’s recall accuracy and (b) details to specify in publications of studies that utilise children’s dietary recalls. Randomly selected children (ages nine to ten) were observed eating school breakfast and school lunch, and interviewed to obtain dietary recalls. Children’s recall accuracy improved slightly between the first and third recalls, but individual children’s accuracy was inconsistent from one interview to the next. Although accuracy was poor overall, it was better for boys with reverse-order (evening-to-morning) prompts, but for girls with forward-order (morning-to-evening) prompts. Children recalled breakfast intake less accurately than lunch intake. Children’s accuracy did not depend on whether recalls were obtained in-person or by telephone, but was better for recalls obtained with open than meal format. Retention interval was crucial as children’s accuracy was better for prior-24-hour recalls (about the 24 hours immediately preceding the interview) than previous-day recalls (about midnight to midnight of the day before the interview). Observations of school meals did not affect children's recalls. Children’s recall accuracy was related to their age/sex body mass index percentile. Conventional report rates (which disregard accuracy for items and amounts) overestimated accuracy for energy and macronutrients, and masked complexities of recall error. Research concerning errors in Children’s dietary recalls provides insight for improving children’s recall accuracy.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/s0002-8223(97)00022-9
发表时间：
1997-01-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Baranowski, T;Smith, M;Resnicow, K
通讯作者：
Resnicow, K
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Baxter, SD;Smith, AF;Frye, FHA
通讯作者：
Frye, FHA
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Baxter, SD;Thompson, WO;Davis, HC
通讯作者：
Davis, HC
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Baxter, Suzanne Domel;Smith, Albert F.;Hardin, James W.
通讯作者：
Hardin, James W.
影响因子：
7
作者：
Livingstone, MBE;Robson, PJ
通讯作者：
Robson, PJ