Ultrasonic elastography to assess biomechanical properties of the optic nerve head and peripapillary sclera of the eye.
Ultrasonic elastography to assess biomechanical properties of the optic nerve head and peripapillary sclera of the eye.
复制标题
超声弹性成像评估视神经乳头和视乳头周围巩膜的生物力学特性。
DOI:
10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106263
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Zhou Q
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qian X;Li R;Lu G;Jiang L;Kang H;Kirk Shung K;Humayun MS;Zhou Q
To quantitatively investigate both optic nerve head (ONH) and peripapillary sclera (PPS) biomechanical properties of porcine eyes through an ultrasonic elastography imaging system in response to both increasing and decreasing intraocular pressure (IOP). The Young’s modulus of the ONH and PPS were assessed using our high resolution ultrasonic imaging system which utilized a mechanical shaker to induce shear waves and an off-axis aligned 40 MHz needle transducer to track micron-level displacement along the direction of wave propagation. In this study, imaging on a total of 8 ex vivo porcine eyes preloaded with IOPs from 6 mmHg to 30 mmHg was performed. To have a better understanding of the effect of varying IOP on biomechanics, both increasing and decreasing IOPs were investigated. The increase of the Young’s modulus of ONH (92.4 ± 13.9 kPa at 6 mmHg to 224.7 ± 71.1 kPa at 30 mmHg) and PPS (176.8 ± 14.3 kPa at 6 mmHg to 573.5 ± 64.4 kPa at 30 mmHg) following IOP elevation could be observed in the reconstructed Young’s modulus of the shear wave elasticity (SWE) imaging while the B-mode structural images remained almost unchanged. In addition, for the same IOP level, both ONH and PPS have a tendency to be stiffer with decreasing IOP as compared to increasing IOP. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using our ultrasonic elastography system to investigate the stiffness mapping of posterior eye with high resolution in both increasing and decreasing IOPs, making this technique potentially useful for glaucoma.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1109/tbme.2018.2853571
发表时间:
2019-03
期刊:
IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering
影响因子:
--
作者:
Qian X;Ma T;Shih CC;Heur M;Zhang J;Shung KK;Varma R;Humayun MS;Zhou Q
通讯作者:
Zhou Q
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Pavlatos E;Ma Y;Clayson K;Pan X;Liu J
通讯作者:
Liu J
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Sigal, IA;Flanagan, JG;Ethier, CR
通讯作者:
Ethier, CR
影响因子:
1.1
作者:
Lei, X. L.;He, Y.;Sun, F. H.
通讯作者:
Sun, F. H.
影响因子:
9.7
作者:
Jan NJ;Sigal IA
通讯作者:
Sigal IA