Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem.

Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem.
复制标题

报告倾向是隐性和显性自尊测量之间差异的根源。

DOI:
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01890.x
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
8.2
通讯作者:
Hermann,AnthonyD
Hermann,AnthonyD
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Olson,MichaelA;Fazio,RussellH;Hermann,AnthonyD

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

在当前的社会认知研究中,内隐测量评估意识无法访问的关联的假设比比皆是。在本报告中,我们质疑这一假设,重点是内隐自尊的结构作为一个例子。虽然研究人员经常认为,内隐测量的自尊是无意识的,我们提供的证据表明,它不是,和内隐和外显的自尊措施之间的差异是报告倾向的结果。研究1表明,个人明确测量的自尊是相对较高的,内隐测量的自尊是相对较低的承认,过度展示自己。在研究2中,内隐和外显措施的自尊相关时,敦促受试者避免过度或低估自己时,回应明确的措施。我们讨论了意识到自己的态度和意识到自己的影响之间的关键区别。
The assumption that implicit measures assess associations that are not accessible to consciousness abounds in current social cognition research. In the present report, we question this assumption, focusing on the construct of implicit self-esteem as a case in point. Although researchers often argue that implicitly measured self-esteem is unconscious, we provide evidence that it is not, and that discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem are the result of reporting tendencies. Study 1 demonstrated that individuals for whom explicitly measured self-esteem is relatively high and implicitly measured self-esteem is relatively low admit to overpresenting themselves. In Study 2, implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem were related when subjects were urged to avoid over- or underpresenting themselves when responding to the explicit measures. We discuss the critical distinction between awareness of one's attitudes and awareness of their influence.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.185
发表时间: 2002-07
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
D. Watson;J. Suls;Jeffrey R. Haig
通讯作者: D. Watson;J. Suls;Jeffrey R. Haig
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
发表时间: 1984-01-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
PAULHUS, DL
通讯作者: PAULHUS, DL
DOI: 10.1080/00207590601068134
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Michela Schröder;A. Rudolph;Anja Wiesner;A. Schütz
通讯作者: A. Schütz
DOI: --
发表时间: 1951
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Rogers
通讯作者: C. Rogers
透过玻璃,不那么黑暗吗?
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.273
发表时间: 2008
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
A. Rudolph;Michela Schröder;A. Schütz;A. Gregg;C. Sedikides
通讯作者: C. Sedikides