Levels and equivalence in credit and qualifications frameworks: contrasting the prescribed and enacted curriculum in school and college
Levels and equivalence in credit and qualifications frameworks: contrasting the prescribed and enacted curriculum in school and college
复制标题
学分和资格框架的水平和等效性:对比学校和大学规定和颁布的课程
DOI:
10.1080/02671520902928507
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Miller K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miller K
Drawing on data from an empirical study of three matched subjects in upper secondary school and further education college in Scotland, this article explores some of the factors that result in differences emerging from the translation of the prescribed curriculum into the enacted curriculum. We argue that these differences raise important questions about equivalences which are being promoted through the development of credit and qualifications frameworks. The article suggests that the standardisation associated with the development of a rational credit and qualifications framework and an outcomes‐based prescribed curriculum cannot be achieved precisely because of the multiplicity that emerges from the practices of translation.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1163/27730840-03902004
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
Scottish Educational Review
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Canning
通讯作者:
R. Canning
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
I. Bates
通讯作者:
I. Bates
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
B. Macdonald
通讯作者:
B. Macdonald
DOI:
10.1177/016146819809900301
发表时间:
1988
期刊:
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
影响因子:
--
作者:
D. Cohen
通讯作者:
D. Cohen
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
J. Smyth;P. Mcinerney;R. Hattam;M. Lawson
通讯作者:
M. Lawson