Acceptability of Web-Based Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Systematic Review.

Acceptability of Web-Based Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Systematic Review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.2196/34655
复制
发表时间:
2022-05-11
期刊:
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Harwood, Joshua
Harwood, Joshua
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scheutzow, Johanna;Attoe, Chris;Harwood, Joshua

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

事实证明,基于网络的干预措施不仅在临床人群中有效,而且在职业环境中也有效。最近在工作环境中进行的研究重点关注这些干预措施的有效性。然而,员工对基于网络的干预措施和计划的接受程度尚未受到类似程度的关注。本次系统评价的目的是基于直接和间接测量,对员工对网络心理健康干预措施的接受程度进行首次全面研究,概述不同类型的网络干预措施对工作相关心理健康问题的效用,并建立该领域的研究基础。该检索于 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 7 月期间进行,并允许任何研究设计。这些研究使用定性或定量数据源。基于网络的干预措施通常旨在支持员工解决心理健康问题。研究特征在表格中概述,并使用交通灯模式根据其质量进行评分。使用常用方法对可接受水平进行单独评级,包括从低到非常高的百分位四分位数。通过多个数据库搜索和其他资源,总共确定了 1303 项研究,其中 28 项 (2%) 被评为符合合成条件。员工可接受水平的结果参差不齐,研究在设计、干预特征和人群方面也存在很大差异。大约 79% (22/28) 的研究概述了从高到非常高的可接受性衡量标准,54% (15/28) 的研究报告了从低到中等的可接受性水平(当研究报告定量和定性结果时重叠)。定性研究还提供了对障碍和偏好的见解,包括简单和定制的应用工具以及对非污名化语言的偏好。然而,研究方法存在多个缺陷,例如参与者和人员的盲法。结果概述了需要通过更同质的可接受性研究进行进一步研究以得出最终结论。然而,基本结果表明,工作场所中基于网络的干预措施有普遍接受的趋势,并且调查结果普遍适用于基于网络的心理健康干预措施的使用。
Web-based interventions have proven to be effective not only in clinical populations but also in the occupational setting. Recent studies conducted in the work environment have focused on the effectiveness of these interventions. However, the role of employees’ acceptability of web-based interventions and programs has not yet enjoyed a similar level of attention. The objective of this systematic review was to conduct the first comprehensive study on employees’ level of acceptability of web-based mental health interventions based on direct and indirect measures, outline the utility of different types of web-based interventions for work-related mental health issues, and build a research base in the field. The search was conducted between October 2018 and July 2019 and allowed for any study design. The studies used either qualitative or quantitative data sources. The web-based interventions were generally aimed at supporting employees with their mental health issues. The study characteristics were outlined in a table as well as graded based on their quality using a traffic light schema. The level of acceptability was individually rated using commonly applied methods, including percentile quartiles ranging from low to very high. A total of 1303 studies were identified through multiple database searches and additional resources, from which 28 (2%) were rated as eligible for the synthesis. The results of employees’ acceptability levels were mixed, and the studies were very heterogeneous in design, intervention characteristics, and population. Approximately 79% (22/28) of the studies outlined acceptability measures from high to very high, and 54% (15/28) of the studies reported acceptability levels from low to moderate (overlap when studies reported both quantitative and qualitative results). Qualitative studies also provided insights into barriers and preferences, including simple and tailored application tools as well as the preference for nonstigmatized language. However, there were multiple flaws in the methodology of the studies, such as the blinding of participants and personnel. The results outline the need for further research with more homogeneous acceptability studies to draw a final conclusion. However, the underlying results show that there is a tendency toward general acceptability of web-based interventions in the workplace, with findings of general applicability to the use of web-based mental health interventions.
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103269
发表时间: 2016-05-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Ebert, David Daniel;Heber, Elena;Lehr, Dirk
通讯作者: Lehr, Dirk
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22135
发表时间: 2013-09-01
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Aardoom, Jiska J.;Dingemans, Alexandra E.;Van Furth, Eric F.
通讯作者: Van Furth, Eric F.
DOI: 10.5688/aj7408141
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Anderson, Claire
通讯作者: Anderson, Claire
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000680
发表时间: 2016-03-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Allexandre, Didier;Bernstein, Adam M.;Morledge, Thomas J.
通讯作者: Morledge, Thomas J.
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0b013e31816c435b
发表时间: 2008-08-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Billings, Douglas W.;Cook, Royer F.;Dove, David C.
通讯作者: Dove, David C.