Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM.
Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Zavala M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Estrada M;Burnett M;Campbell AG;Campbell PB;Denetclaw WF;Gutiérrez CG;Hurtado S;John GH;Matsui J;McGee R;Okpodu CM;Robinson TJ;Summers MF;Werner-Washburne M;Zavala M
改善代表性不足的少数民族（URM）坚持科学，技术，工程和数学（STEM）联合工作组的成员，利用库尔特·卢因的计划方法来改变，描述了五项建议，以提高URM坚持在本科阶段的STEM。由美国国家普通医学科学研究所和霍华德休斯医学研究所召集的联合工作组成员对改善代表性不足的少数民族（URM）在科学、技术、工程和数学（STEM）方面的坚持进行了审查，并提出了关于为什么URM的学术“途径”比白色或亚洲STEM学生泄露更多的讨论。他们建议扩大范围，更加关注需要消除的制度障碍，以及“提升”学生在STEM领域的兴趣、承诺和坚持能力的干预类型。使用库尔特Lewin的计划方法来改变，该委员会描述了五项建议，以提高URM在本科阶段的STEM持久性。这些建议借鉴了已知的成功经验，认识到问责制的必要性，旨在促进今后取得更大进展。这些建议的影响取决于实施第一项建议：跟踪体制一级的成功和失败，收集有助于解释现有趋势的数据。
Members of the Joint Working Group on Improving Underrepresented Minorities (URMs) Persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), utilizing Kurt Lewin’s planned approach to change, describe five recommendations to increase URM persistence in STEM at the undergraduate level. Members of the Joint Working Group on Improving Underrepresented Minorities (URMs) Persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)—convened by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute—review current data and propose deliberation about why the academic “pathways” leak more for URM than white or Asian STEM students. They suggest expanding to include a stronger focus on the institutional barriers that need to be removed and the types of interventions that “lift” students’ interests, commitment, and ability to persist in STEM fields. Using Kurt Lewin’s planned approach to change, the committee describes five recommendations to increase URM persistence in STEM at the undergraduate level. These recommendations capitalize on known successes, recognize the need for accountability, and are framed to facilitate greater progress in the future. The impact of these recommendations rests upon enacting the first recommendation: to track successes and failures at the institutional level and collect data that help explain the existing trends.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
CBE life sciences education
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bangera G;Brownell SE
通讯作者：
Brownell SE
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Chemers, Martin M.;Zurbriggen, Eileen L.;Bearman, Steve
通讯作者：
Bearman, Steve
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Chang, Mitchell J.;Eagan, M. Kevin;Hurtado, Sylvia
通讯作者：
Hurtado, Sylvia
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.14-01-0004
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
CBE life sciences education
影响因子：
--
作者：
Auchincloss LC;Laursen SL;Branchaw JL;Eagan K;Graham M;Hanauer DI;Lawrie G;McLinn CM;Pelaez N;Rowland S;Towns M;Trautmann NM;Varma-Nelson P;Weston TJ;Dolan EL
通讯作者：
Dolan EL
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Harackiewicz, Judith M.;Canning, Elizabeth A.;Hyde, Janet S.
通讯作者：
Hyde, Janet S.