Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters.

Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/1744-9081-7-9
复制
发表时间:
2011-04-27
期刊:
Behavioral and brain functions : BBF
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Steinbusch HM
Steinbusch HM
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Strekalova T;Couch Y;Kholod N;Boyks M;Malin D;Leprince P;Steinbusch HM

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

迄今为止,使用慢性应激模型诱导抑郁样状态的可靠性面临着许多方法上的限制。我们相信,本文提出的小鼠应激模式的修改允许克服这些限制中的一些。在这里,我们讨论一个变种的标准压力范式,这导致快感缺乏。这种快感缺失状态定义为并非所有动物均表现出的蔗糖偏好降低。因此,我们建议使用非快感缺乏,强调小鼠作为内部控制实验小鼠模型的抑郁症。应用内部控制压力的影响,沿着优化的行为测试,可以使生物相关的压力诱导的快感缺乏与压力的后果单独在慢性压力抑郁模型的分析。例如,在受到压力的快感缺乏和非快感缺乏群体中,不同的生理和分子特征说明了这一点。这些结果表明,使用一个亚组的个人谁是负的抑郁症表型的诱导在实验范式的抑郁症作为内部控制,更精细的建模这种疾病的动物。
To date, the reliability of induction of a depressive-like state using chronic stress models is confronted by many methodological limitations. We believe that the modifications to the stress paradigm in mice proposed herein allow some of these limitations to be overcome. Here, we discuss a variant of the standard stress paradigm, which results in anhedonia. This anhedonic state was defined by a decrease in sucrose preference that was not exhibited by all animals. As such, we propose the use of non-anhedonic, stressed mice as an internal control in experimental mouse models of depression. The application of an internal control for the effects of stress, along with optimized behavioural testing, can enable the analysis of biological correlates of stress-induced anhedonia versus the consequences of stress alone in a chronic-stress depression model. This is illustrated, for instance, by distinct physiological and molecular profiles in anhedonic and non-anhedonic groups subjected to stress. These results argue for the use of a subgroup of individuals who are negative for the induction of a depressive phenotype during experimental paradigms of depression as an internal control, for more refined modeling of this disorder in animals.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.03.003
发表时间: 2007-05-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Cao, Ling;Hudson, Chad A.;Moynihan, Jan A.
通讯作者: Moynihan, Jan A.
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.049
发表时间: 2010-12-06
期刊: BRAIN RESEARCH
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Chung, Eun S.;Chung, Young C.;Jin, Byung K.
通讯作者: Jin, Byung K.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.015
发表时间: 2006-11-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Burne, Thomas H. J.;O'Loan, Jonathon;Eyles, Darryl W.
通讯作者: Eyles, Darryl W.
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-007-0065-9
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Bergstroem, A.;Jayatissa, M. N.;Wiborg, O.
通讯作者: Wiborg, O.
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00396-5
发表时间: 2002-05-14
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Bertoglio, LJ;Carobrez, AP
通讯作者: Carobrez, AP