On the role of (implicit) drinking self-identity in alcohol use and problematic drinking: A comparison of five measures.

On the role of (implicit) drinking self-identity in alcohol use and problematic drinking: A comparison of five measures.
复制标题

关于(内隐)饮酒认同在饮酒和问题饮酒中的作用:五种测量方法的比较。

DOI:
10.1037/adb0000643
复制
发表时间:
2021-06
期刊:
Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
De Houwer J
De Houwer J
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cummins J;Lindgren KP;De Houwer J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

内隐和外显饮酒自我认同似乎是有用的预测酒精相关的结果。然而,有几种不同的内隐和外显的措施,可用于评估饮酒自我认同。这些隐式度量中的一些还可以捕获关系信息(例如,我是一个酒鬼,我应该是一个酒鬼),这可能会提供独特的优势。尽管饮酒自我认同的良好措施很重要,但迄今为止,这些措施几乎没有直接比较。本研究(N = 358)系统地比较了两种常用的饮酒自我认同的测量方法(一种是内隐的,一种是外显的:IAT和ASCS)与三种内隐自我认同的相关测量方法(aIAT,RRT和pCIT),这些测量方法与实验和临床酒精研究人员的一系列标准相关。总体而言,我们发现隐含措施的表现不一。有趣的是,aIAT探测应该为基础的饮酒身份比标准的IAT表现更好。然而,在所有标准中,显式测量表现出优于所有其他测量的上级性能。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员谁希望评估饮酒相关的自我认同,并预测酒精相关的结果横截面应该把重点主要放在使用(和进一步发展)的ASCS,而不是任何的隐式措施。未来的研究重点是ASCS应寻求调查我们的研究结果的患者人群的普遍性,并纳入该程序中的相关信息,以进一步提高其已经强大的效用。
Implicit and explicit drinking self-identity appear to be useful in predicting alcohol-related outcomes. However, there are several different implicit and explicit measures which can be used to assess drinking self-identity. Some of these implicit measures can also capture relational information (e.g., I am a drinker, I should be a drinker), which might provide unique advantages. Despite the importance of having good measures of drinking self-identity, to date there has been little direct comparison of these measures. This study (N = 358) systematically compared two commonly-used measures of drinking self-identity (one implicit and one explicit: the IAT and the ASCS) with three relational measures of implicit self-identity (the aIAT, the RRT, and the pCIT) on a range of criteria relevant to experimental and clinical alcohol researchers. Overall, we found mixed performances on the implicit measures. Interestingly, the aIAT which probed should-based drinking identity performed better than the standard IAT. However, the explicit measure exhibited superior performance to all other measures across all criteria. Our results suggest that researchers who wish to assess drinking-related self-identity and to predict alcohol-related outcomes cross-sectionally should set their focus primarily on the use (and further development) of the ASCS, rather than any of the implicit measures. Future research focusing on the ASCS should seek to investigate the generalisability of our findings to patient populations, and incorporate relational information within that procedure in order to further improve upon its already-strong utility.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00519
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Agosta S;Sartori G
通讯作者: Sartori G
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01402
发表时间: 2015-10-08
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Heider, Niclas;Spruyt, Adriaan;De Houwer, Jan
通讯作者: De Houwer, Jan
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
发表时间: 2003-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者: Banaji, MR
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
发表时间: 1998-06-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者: Schwartz, JLK
DOI: 10.1037/met0000194
发表时间: 2019-08-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
De Schryver, Maarten;De Neve, Jan
通讯作者: De Neve, Jan