On the role of (implicit) drinking self-identity in alcohol use and problematic drinking: A comparison of five measures.
On the role of (implicit) drinking self-identity in alcohol use and problematic drinking: A comparison of five measures.
复制标题
关于(内隐)饮酒认同在饮酒和问题饮酒中的作用:五种测量方法的比较。
DOI:
10.1037/adb0000643
复制
发表时间:
2021-06
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
De Houwer J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cummins J;Lindgren KP;De Houwer J
Implicit and explicit drinking self-identity appear to be useful in predicting alcohol-related outcomes. However, there are several different implicit and explicit measures which can be used to assess drinking self-identity. Some of these implicit measures can also capture relational information (e.g., I am a drinker, I should be a drinker), which might provide unique advantages. Despite the importance of having good measures of drinking self-identity, to date there has been little direct comparison of these measures. This study (N = 358) systematically compared two commonly-used measures of drinking self-identity (one implicit and one explicit: the IAT and the ASCS) with three relational measures of implicit self-identity (the aIAT, the RRT, and the pCIT) on a range of criteria relevant to experimental and clinical alcohol researchers. Overall, we found mixed performances on the implicit measures. Interestingly, the aIAT which probed should-based drinking identity performed better than the standard IAT. However, the explicit measure exhibited superior performance to all other measures across all criteria. Our results suggest that researchers who wish to assess drinking-related self-identity and to predict alcohol-related outcomes cross-sectionally should set their focus primarily on the use (and further development) of the ASCS, rather than any of the implicit measures. Future research focusing on the ASCS should seek to investigate the generalisability of our findings to patient populations, and incorporate relational information within that procedure in order to further improve upon its already-strong utility.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Agosta S;Sartori G
通讯作者:
Sartori G
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Heider, Niclas;Spruyt, Adriaan;De Houwer, Jan
通讯作者:
De Houwer, Jan
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者:
Banaji, MR
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者:
Schwartz, JLK
影响因子:
7
作者:
De Schryver, Maarten;De Neve, Jan
通讯作者:
De Neve, Jan