Capturing practitioner perspectives on infrastructure resilience using Q-methodology
Capturing practitioner perspectives on infrastructure resilience using Q-methodology
复制标题
使用 Q 方法捕捉从业者对基础设施弹性的看法
DOI：
10.1088/2634-4505/ac0f98
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Redman, Charles L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kim, Yeowon;Grimm, Nancy B;Chester, Mikhail V;Redman, Charles L
在许多学科中，弹性概念被应用于管理系统中的扰动、挑战或冲击，以及设计一个自适应系统。特别是，弹性基础设施系统已被认为是传统基础设施的替代方案，在这种基础设施中，系统在应对城市地区不可预见和未知威胁时更加可靠。也许是由于弹性概念的延展性和多学科性，目前还没有明确的标准来衡量和描述基础设施弹性，也没有明确的标准来确定如何在城市基础设施系统的发展中实施这一概念。因此，现实世界中不可避免地会出现从业者和决策者对这一概念的主观解释。我们通过使用q -方法论，询问在凤凰城市区的政府机构工作的从业人员，根据他们对弹性的解释，展示了对基础设施弹性的主观观点。我们要求从业者优先考虑在三种不同决策背景下的文献中发现的19个关键基础设施弹性策略，并通过分析从业者的共享或离散观点来识别六种话语。我们的结论是，从本研究中观察到的基础设施弹性的不同角度来看，从业者对弹性的解释通过揭示为什么以及如何在实践中选择和应用不同的弹性策略，为文献中发现的理论弹性概念增加了价值。
In many disciplines, the resilience concept has applied to managing perturbations, challenges, or shocks in the system and designing an adaptive system. In particular, resilient infrastructure systems have been recognized as an alternative to traditional infrastructure, in which the systems are managed to be more reliable against unforeseen and unknown threats in urban areas. Perhaps owing to the malleable and multidisciplinary nature in the concept of resilience, there is no clear-cut standard that measures and characterizes infrastructure resilience nor how to implement the concept in practice for developing urban infrastructure systems. As a result, unavoidable subjective interpretation of the concept by practitioners and decision-makers occurs in the real world. We demonstrate the subjective perspectives on infrastructure resilience by asking practitioners working in governmental institutions within the metropolitan Phoenix area based on their interpretations of resilience, using Q-methodology. We asked practitioners to prioritize 19 key strategies for infrastructure resilience found in literature in three different decision contexts and recognized six discourses by analyzing the shared or discrete views of the practitioners. We conclude that, from the diverse perspectives on infrastructure resilience observed in this study, practitioners' interpretation of resilience adds value to theoretical resilience concepts found in the literature by revealing why and how different resilience strategies are preferred and applied in practice.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6
作者：
Rosenzweig, Bernice;Ruddell, Benjamin L.;McPhillips, Lauren;Hobbins, Robert;McPhearson, Timon;Cheng, Zhongqi;Chang, Heejun;Kim, Yeowon
通讯作者：
Kim, Yeowon
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Park, J.;Seager, T. P.;Linkov, I.
通讯作者：
Linkov, I.
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.010
发表时间：
2015-01-01
影响因子：
8.9
作者：
Aldunce, Paulina;Beilin, Ruth;Handmer, John
通讯作者：
Handmer, John
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101355
发表时间：
2020-01-01
影响因子：
5
作者：
Keating, Adriana;Hanger-Kopp, Susanne
通讯作者：
Hanger-Kopp, Susanne
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Chester, Mikhail, V;Allenby, Braden
通讯作者：
Allenby, Braden