Evolutionarily conserved neural signatures involved in sequencing predictions and their relevance for language.
Evolutionarily conserved neural signatures involved in sequencing predictions and their relevance for language.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.05.002
复制
发表时间：
2018-06
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Petkov CI
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kikuchi Y;Sedley W;Griffiths TD;Petkov CI
顺序学习与语言操作之间的关系仍然存在争议。人类和比较研究的经验证据澄清并限制了联系。神经振荡排序在时间上类似于语言操作。我们扩展了语言进化的关系知识假说。祖先神经系统与语言中类似的时间功能相结合。从先前的事件中预测未来事件的发生对动物的感知和认知至关重要。尽管这种顺序学习（关系知识的一种形式）与语言中的特定操作之间的关系仍存在争议，但最近的证据表明，与失语症相关的额叶损伤会破坏顺序学习。此外，在不同时间尺度上的神经测序预测与在相似时间尺度上发生的语言操作相似。此外，人类和猴子的比较研究强调了进化上保守的额叶基底和颞叶处理习得语音信号序列的预测振荡特征。总的来说，这些证据支持语言进化的关系知识假说，提出人类的语言过程在功能上与祖先的神经系统相结合，用于预测序列学习。
How sequence learning relates to language operations remains controversial. Empirical evidence in humans and comparative studies clarifies and constrains links. Neural oscillatory sequencing resembles language operations in time. We extend a relational knowledge hypothesis of language evolution. Ancestral neural system is integrated with analogous temporal functions in language. Predicting the occurrence of future events from prior ones is vital for animal perception and cognition. Although how such sequence learning (a form of relational knowledge) relates to particular operations in language remains controversial, recent evidence shows that sequence learning is disrupted in frontal lobe damage associated with aphasia. Also, neural sequencing predictions at different temporal scales resemble those involved in language operations occurring at similar scales. Furthermore, comparative work in humans and monkeys highlights evolutionarily conserved frontal substrates and predictive oscillatory signatures in the temporal lobe processing learned sequences of speech signals. Altogether this evidence supports a relational knowledge hypothesis of language evolution, proposing that language processes in humans are functionally integrated with an ancestral neural system for predictive sequence learning.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
16.2
作者：
Fries P
通讯作者：
Fries P
影响因子：
19.9
作者：
Fedorenko, Evelina;Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
通讯作者：
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Chen J;Dastjerdi M;Foster BL;LaRocque KF;Rauschecker AM;Parvizi J;Wagner AD
通讯作者：
Wagner AD
影响因子：
16.2
作者：
Buzsáki G;Logothetis N;Singer W
通讯作者：
Singer W
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1525030113
发表时间：
2016-06-14
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Duerschmid, Stefan;Edwards, Erik;Knight, Robert T.
通讯作者：
Knight, Robert T.